Received: by 2002:a25:23cc:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j195csp1294469ybj; Tue, 5 May 2020 17:24:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJYSSeDWXDmw7n326rBOVmtGqElRmBhd840waOJmzvWVRcDpy+9kB4E9E72QP5Yut/oOD+I X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:688:: with SMTP id f8mr4829881edy.233.1588724699835; Tue, 05 May 2020 17:24:59 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1588724699; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XPiJ5oxe6Ak0zgM0+V1v07j9ef1Z8bqy0s9vwcD0D9qTlpGUhBk8ByHALIAbX13W8r 9/5O6m+QkNBDTYVR5t34G9sM79x8MUMjifEhrPNGSMvr63D41RlIZL0nvAgOpc+255v5 oK8Ot7h9jUwBLMi5KAHbF34bYy8rV4juCNyu3fQ6p0uNzOXzER+GfRvPg0wgYuVAu4si W04ma45Z3O6I2XMMjcOXg4dwgzM4vPfVn4ObrRwwVDkY+KU8oRTd5wr8Fmz4KlVYfSVl gacXmTle7oJZU34seLAoOUccfgDEEcQZb8PbXZv5PBT6tlnZQ+QIJL0ct1KlXICxmUfy DkLg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=QoqKXjvHS1POFny3QwrSW9RfCPL+8QBVwaJ8hMnU7Dg=; b=t8Skf+HE2gc5GW87yG3GJysI8AdD/0izJK3ecfbjZ1e6DSL70tviKSbJJubcc2BQUX upUBuB9jCU6AlFI5ZTvA+GD+jBcBaTsTT4RUaQFU1nspQ/PkQJZd2UZAE59UZD0ZAahw m71rAE9dApPCDGXRKQt+Sv50SHIvf7nWylZeXshjhZ61k6vdrRf6vcWE5pNa46ZaspJz qa+H5Tby0jyb7Y7iGSTpvqXHU+wyZbgzawNFCCIC1TRHgLdvYDJ8cwUdBE8Njgp4kfPq yEmNUXnTO0QlabJkacC04rvS+CcKlwefpyy2UguJPLCDv4zgQX/PLn8BZgRk+OhaAwWK H0fw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=GMtg5u3V; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bz15si136685ejc.391.2020.05.05.17.24.35; Tue, 05 May 2020 17:24:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=GMtg5u3V; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729510AbgEFAWp (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 5 May 2020 20:22:45 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:41834 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728609AbgEFAWp (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 May 2020 20:22:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1588724564; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=QoqKXjvHS1POFny3QwrSW9RfCPL+8QBVwaJ8hMnU7Dg=; b=GMtg5u3V3ux1e2JFEZCzfioibkN0672ovbrqgn4rLmVYbfAIjNLeakLioPgT9G0tQFqeVF xEph5LjebH2eDgAqKuML7WbHeEU3t/sJ2Oicd5JoHWwJvZ+119HkbIv41oQE9SYN06xkOl 2CEN6gx8Ec8hlWErCnbcHjniNWyX2wE= Received: from mail-wr1-f72.google.com (mail-wr1-f72.google.com [209.85.221.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-391-dlb8Rp0uOKyabShiwyvtng-1; Tue, 05 May 2020 20:22:42 -0400 X-MC-Unique: dlb8Rp0uOKyabShiwyvtng-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f72.google.com with SMTP id 30so304948wrq.15 for ; Tue, 05 May 2020 17:22:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=QoqKXjvHS1POFny3QwrSW9RfCPL+8QBVwaJ8hMnU7Dg=; b=iWQjjuipLjKZ8wU+/bqs+EzdmkaXFKB/KgXU8BRhV0U5iaw9e2uvNaPkZLpTllcY3f UyiOgHB/TFiCbpKwMJ75m5AJPPhm9zqBTO2vxZarFosrhxoo23pq+nj5+gbRAeVrAWBB h3Q97yPXycs+o4ynYByvF1N63Y6UKQkEpbiPONjkODBmoG7LvDx0WNcgdkloZbwjOwkd zJJAojo3OCAdJVb0jJm/sopCjoGrklMmttmZFiPY4Jj9nQw9b/drCuUFGis1QJdjxTWK Mac2BqVw94Z+lBP937jyLu5ytVxUn5Dhci8rz90Oec0ayDHSnLws77fynnp8JyjnoU0D gpAA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubG+mTRcTDq9rB/lThyawimRiHImJ7gzLI8jCE6kuRgRcw9I/D8 Z+OVo0CA6Cu3bTaFUrn7u+fa7MUwr+STMkk09SgWonRXE4scZsoRK8Nqh6Lj/L5BHGKGTpxfi8C fcfKOTyiS2iZ8Wa6cV3rhaoOc X-Received: by 2002:adf:f4c4:: with SMTP id h4mr6674140wrp.142.1588724561119; Tue, 05 May 2020 17:22:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:adf:f4c4:: with SMTP id h4mr6674112wrp.142.1588724560893; Tue, 05 May 2020 17:22:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhat.com (bzq-109-66-7-121.red.bezeqint.net. [109.66.7.121]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n12sm299685wrj.95.2020.05.05.17.22.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 05 May 2020 17:22:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 20:22:37 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Bharat Bhushan Cc: jean-philippe@linaro.org, joro@8bytes.org, jasowang@redhat.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, eric.auger.pro@gmail.com, eric.auger@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] iommu/virtio: Use page size bitmap supported by endpoint Message-ID: <20200505200659-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20200505093004.1935-1-bbhushan2@marvell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200505093004.1935-1-bbhushan2@marvell.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 03:00:04PM +0530, Bharat Bhushan wrote: > Different endpoint can support different page size, probe > endpoint if it supports specific page size otherwise use > global page sizes. > > Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan > --- > v4->v5: > - Rebase to Linux v5.7-rc4 > > v3->v4: > - Fix whitespace error > > v2->v3: > - Fixed error return for incompatible endpoint > - __u64 changed to __le64 in header file > > drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h | 7 +++++ > 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c > index d5cac4f46ca5..9513d2ab819e 100644 > --- a/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c > +++ b/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c > @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ struct viommu_endpoint { > struct viommu_dev *viommu; > struct viommu_domain *vdomain; > struct list_head resv_regions; > + u64 pgsize_bitmap; > }; > > struct viommu_request { > @@ -415,6 +416,19 @@ static int viommu_replay_mappings(struct viommu_domain *vdomain) > return ret; > } > > +static int viommu_set_pgsize_bitmap(struct viommu_endpoint *vdev, > + struct virtio_iommu_probe_pgsize_mask *mask, > + size_t len) > +{ > + u64 pgsize_bitmap = le64_to_cpu(mask->pgsize_bitmap); > + > + if (len < sizeof(*mask)) This is too late to validate length, you have dereferenced it already. do it before the read pls. > + return -EINVAL; OK but note that guest will then just proceed to ignore the property. Is that really OK? Wouldn't host want to know? > + > + vdev->pgsize_bitmap = pgsize_bitmap; what if bitmap is 0? Is that a valid size? I see a bunch of BUG_ON with that value ... I also see a bunch of code like e.g. this: pg_size = 1UL << __ffs(pgsize_bitmap); which probably won't DTRT on a 32 bit guest if the bitmap has bits set in the high word. > + return 0; > +} > + > static int viommu_add_resv_mem(struct viommu_endpoint *vdev, > struct virtio_iommu_probe_resv_mem *mem, > size_t len) > @@ -499,6 +513,9 @@ static int viommu_probe_endpoint(struct viommu_dev *viommu, struct device *dev) > case VIRTIO_IOMMU_PROBE_T_RESV_MEM: > ret = viommu_add_resv_mem(vdev, (void *)prop, len); > break; > + case VIRTIO_IOMMU_PROBE_T_PAGE_SIZE_MASK: > + ret = viommu_set_pgsize_bitmap(vdev, (void *)prop, len); > + break; > default: > dev_err(dev, "unknown viommu prop 0x%x\n", type); > } > @@ -630,7 +647,7 @@ static int viommu_domain_finalise(struct viommu_endpoint *vdev, > > vdomain->id = (unsigned int)ret; > > - domain->pgsize_bitmap = viommu->pgsize_bitmap; > + domain->pgsize_bitmap = vdev->pgsize_bitmap; > domain->geometry = viommu->geometry; > > vdomain->map_flags = viommu->map_flags; > @@ -654,6 +671,29 @@ static void viommu_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain) > kfree(vdomain); > } > > +/* > + * Check whether the endpoint's capabilities are compatible with other > + * endpoints in the domain. Report any inconsistency. > + */ > +static bool viommu_endpoint_is_compatible(struct viommu_endpoint *vdev, > + struct viommu_domain *vdomain) > +{ > + struct device *dev = vdev->dev; > + > + if (vdomain->viommu != vdev->viommu) { > + dev_err(dev, "cannot attach to foreign vIOMMU\n"); > + return false; > + } > + > + if (vdomain->domain.pgsize_bitmap != vdev->pgsize_bitmap) { > + dev_err(dev, "incompatible domain bitmap 0x%lx != 0x%llx\n", > + vdomain->domain.pgsize_bitmap, vdev->pgsize_bitmap); > + return false; > + } I'm confused by this. So let's assume host supports pages sizes of 4k, 2M, 1G. It signals this in the properties. Nice. Now domain supports 4k, 2M and that's all. Why is that a problem? Just don't use 1G ... > + > + return true; > +} > + > static int viommu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev) > { > int i; > @@ -670,9 +710,8 @@ static int viommu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev) > * owns it. > */ > ret = viommu_domain_finalise(vdev, domain); > - } else if (vdomain->viommu != vdev->viommu) { > - dev_err(dev, "cannot attach to foreign vIOMMU\n"); > - ret = -EXDEV; > + } else if (!viommu_endpoint_is_compatible(vdev, vdomain)) { > + ret = -EINVAL; > } > mutex_unlock(&vdomain->mutex); > > @@ -886,6 +925,7 @@ static int viommu_add_device(struct device *dev) > > vdev->dev = dev; > vdev->viommu = viommu; > + vdev->pgsize_bitmap = viommu->pgsize_bitmap; > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vdev->resv_regions); > dev_iommu_priv_set(dev, vdev); > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h > index 48e3c29223b5..2cced7accc99 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h As any virtio UAPI change, you need to copy virtio TC at some point before this is merged ... > @@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ struct virtio_iommu_req_unmap { > > #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_PROBE_T_NONE 0 > #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_PROBE_T_RESV_MEM 1 > +#define VIRTIO_IOMMU_PROBE_T_PAGE_SIZE_MASK 2 > > #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_PROBE_T_MASK 0xfff > Does host need to know that guest will ignore the page size mask? Maybe we need a feature bit. > @@ -119,6 +120,12 @@ struct virtio_iommu_probe_property { > __le16 length; > }; > > +struct virtio_iommu_probe_pgsize_mask { > + struct virtio_iommu_probe_property head; > + __u8 reserved[4]; > + __le64 pgsize_bitmap; > +}; > + This is UAPI. Document the format of pgsize_bitmap please. > #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_RESV_MEM_T_RESERVED 0 > #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_RESV_MEM_T_MSI 1 > > -- > 2.17.1