Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/5200: update contact email
In-Reply-To: <20200505160410.GH2468@ninjato>
References: <20200502142642.18979-1-wsa@kernel.org> <877dxsdl5e.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> <20200505160410.GH2468@ninjato>
Date:   Wed, 06 May 2020 16:22:33 +1000
Message-ID: <87imh9d1li.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org> writes:
>> > My 'pengutronix' address is defunct for years. Merge the entries and use
>> > the proper contact address.
>> 
>> Is there any point adding the new address? It's just likely to bit-rot
>> one day too.
>
> At least, this one is a group address, not an individual one, so less
> likey.
>
>> I figure the git history is a better source for more up-to-date emails.
>
> But yes, can still be argued. I won't persist if you don't like it.

That's fine, I'll merge this. You've already gone to the trouble to send
it and it's better than what we have now.

cheers