Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 17:34:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 17:32:59 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:2177 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 17:32:19 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 14:32:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20011022.143220.104032822.davem@redhat.com> To: god@yinyang.hjsoft.com Cc: gkade@bigbrother.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-kernel-legal? was From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To:

X-Mailer: Mew version 2.0 on Emacs 21.0 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "Mr. Shannon Aldinger" Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 16:21:23 -0400 (EDT) Here I thought we had Republicans fighting to make the US a republic and Democrats fighting to make it a Democracy. Oh well, my mistake. Can someone start a seperate mailing list maybe linux-kernel-legal. It would be a good place for this and discussion of any other new laws, US and other that effect the kernel hackers. As a bonus it wouldn't distract from the patches. The EFF and many other organizations concerned about the DMCA issues have suitable public lists for discussion of this topic. I do not see a need for a new vger list. You can just as well take this 2.2.x changelog thread there. In fact, they're probably already talking about it :-) Franks a lot, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/