Message-ID: <441060D2.6090800@openvz.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 20:07:30 +0300
From: Kirill Korotaev <dev@openvz.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; ru-RU; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030426
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jan Blunck <jblunck@suse.de>
CC: akpm@osdl.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, olh@suse.de, neilb@suse.de,
       dev@openvz.org, bsingharora@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix shrink_dcache_parent() against shrink_dcache_memory()
 race (3rd updated patch)]
References: <20060309165833.GK4243@hasse.suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <20060309165833.GK4243@hasse.suse.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 6456
Lines: 180

Andrew,

Acked-By: Kirill Korotaev <dev@openvz.org>

> This is an updated version of the patch which adresses some issues that came
> up during discussion.
> 
> The wait_on_prunes() code has moved to generic_shutdown_super() to avoid
> hiding the mess in shrink_dcache_parent(). Recently updated the comments
> to be more verbose about the goals of the modification.
> 
> Original patch description:
> 
> Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru> discovered a race between shrink_dcache_parent()
> and shrink_dcache_memory() which leads to "Busy inodes after unmount".
> When unmounting a file system shrink_dcache_parent() is racing against a
> possible shrink_dcache_memory(). This might lead to the situation that
> shrink_dcache_parent() is returning too early. In this situation the
> super_block is destroyed before shrink_dcache_memory() could put the inode.
> 
> This patch fixes the problem through introducing a prunes counter which is
> incremented when a dentry is pruned but the corresponding inoded isn't put
> yet.When the prunes counter is not null, shrink_dcache_parent() is waiting and
> restarting its work.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> ---
> 
>  fs/dcache.c        |    9 +++++++
>  fs/super.c         |   61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  include/linux/fs.h |    3 ++
>  3 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/fs/dcache.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/dcache.c
> +++ linux-2.6/fs/dcache.c
> @@ -361,20 +361,29 @@ restart:
>   * This requires that the LRU list has already been
>   * removed.
>   * Called with dcache_lock, drops it and then regains.
> + *
> + * Wakes up any pending waiters (see wait_on_prunes()) if the
> + * dentry's filesystem is being umounted.
>   */
>  static inline void prune_one_dentry(struct dentry * dentry)
>  {
> +	struct super_block *sb = dentry->d_sb;
>  	struct dentry * parent;
>  
>  	__d_drop(dentry);
>  	list_del(&dentry->d_u.d_child);
>  	dentry_stat.nr_dentry--;	/* For d_free, below */
> +	sb->s_prunes++;
>  	dentry_iput(dentry);
>  	parent = dentry->d_parent;
>  	d_free(dentry);
>  	if (parent != dentry)
>  		dput(parent);
>  	spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
> +	sb->s_prunes--;
> +	/* FIXME: this might be avoided through checking for sb->s_root */
> +	if (likely(!sb->s_prunes))
> +		wake_up(&sb->s_wait_prunes);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> Index: linux-2.6/fs/super.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/super.c
> +++ linux-2.6/fs/super.c
> @@ -80,6 +80,8 @@ static struct super_block *alloc_super(v
>  		sema_init(&s->s_dquot.dqio_sem, 1);
>  		sema_init(&s->s_dquot.dqonoff_sem, 1);
>  		init_rwsem(&s->s_dquot.dqptr_sem);
> +		s->s_prunes = 0;
> +		init_waitqueue_head(&s->s_wait_prunes);
>  		init_waitqueue_head(&s->s_wait_unfrozen);
>  		s->s_maxbytes = MAX_NON_LFS;
>  		s->dq_op = sb_dquot_ops;
> @@ -213,6 +215,51 @@ static int grab_super(struct super_block
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * A special version of wait_event(!sb->s_prunes) which takes the dcache_lock
> + * when checking the condition and gives feedback if we have waited for
> + * remaining prunes.
> + *
> + * While we are waiting for pruned dentries to iput() their inode, the
> + * sb->s_prunes count is none zero. Since the s_prunes counter is modified
> + * by prune_one_dentry() under dcache_lock, either the reference count on the
> + * parent dentry is wrong (and therefore it isn't on the lru-list yet) and we
> + * are waiting because s_prunes != 0 or the reference count is correct (and the
> + * parent dentry might be found by select_parent()) and the s_prunes == 0. This
> + * is the reason for that we have to restart loop on select_parent() and
> + * prune_dcache() as long as we are waiting on pruned dentries here (see the
> + * usage of wait_on_prunes() in generic_shutdown_super()). This is not
> + * live-locking because we only call wait_on_prunes() if we are umounting the
> + * filesystem (sb->s_root == NULL), therefore noone is having a reference to
> + * the vfsmount structure anymore and hence shouldn't have a reference to a
> + * dentry.
> + */
> +static int wait_on_prunes(struct super_block *sb)
> +{
> +	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
> +	int prunes_remaining = 0;
> +
> +#ifdef DCACHE_DEBUG
> +	printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: waiting for %d prunes\n", __FUNCTION__,
> +	       sb->s_prunes);
> +#endif
> +
> +	spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
> +	for (;;) {
> +		prepare_to_wait(&sb->s_wait_prunes, &wait,
> +				TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> +		if (!sb->s_prunes)
> +			break;
> +		spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
> +		schedule();
> +		prunes_remaining = 1;
> +		spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
> +	}
> +	spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
> +	finish_wait(&sb->s_wait_prunes, &wait);
> +	return prunes_remaining;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   *	generic_shutdown_super	-	common helper for ->kill_sb()
>   *	@sb: superblock to kill
> @@ -230,8 +277,20 @@ void generic_shutdown_super(struct super
>  
>  	if (root) {
>  		sb->s_root = NULL;
> -		shrink_dcache_parent(root);
>  		shrink_dcache_anon(&sb->s_anon);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * If we have waited for a pruned dentry which parent wasn't
> +		 * unhashed yet, that parent will end up on the lru-list.
> +		 * Therefore, we need to run shrink_dcache_parent() again
> +		 * after we waited for pruned dentries in wait_on_prunes().
> +		 *
> +		 * NOTE: Also read the comment on wait_on_prunes() above.
> +		 */
> +		do {
> +			shrink_dcache_parent(root);
> +		} while(wait_on_prunes(sb));
> +
>  		dput(root);
>  		fsync_super(sb);
>  		lock_super(sb);
> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/fs.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -836,6 +836,9 @@ struct super_block {
>  	struct list_head	s_instances;
>  	struct quota_info	s_dquot;	/* Diskquota specific options */
>  
> +	unsigned int		s_prunes;	/* protected by dcache_lock */
> +	wait_queue_head_t	s_wait_prunes;
> +
>  	int			s_frozen;
>  	wait_queue_head_t	s_wait_unfrozen;
>  


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/