Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 6 May 2020 15:55:02 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc:     ndesaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
        x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
        bristot <bristot@redhat.com>, jbaron <jbaron@akamai.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/18] static_call: Add static_cond_call()
Message-ID: <20200506135502.GS3762@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20200501202849.647891881@infradead.org>
 <20200504201445.GQ3762@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20200505093625.GE5298@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <CAKwvOd=cP8UCX0+5pZ3AqzvOM8LKzLJJ_heDhrghqJdOnHoGMg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKwvOdkL+2Gvn2mkZ8cdHN=1F5cHQHii57ocD0RFeLJxEt=TUQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHk-=wiUd=fcpegFLK4VK9iFfrO5BmpGKDszGpuyJkDdz4JaoQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <656098739.766.1588705237442.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
 <CAKwvOdnLze0e3Vwmb1Xdqwcwe9h6gnAwGnt3ksiNX7ENb_3Y9w@mail.gmail.com>
 <470458191.1021.1588710464160.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <470458191.1021.1588710464160.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 04:27:44PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Actually, if the goal is to do code patching of the call, I wonder
> what makes it OK to "guess" all the call patterns generated by the compiler ?

We're not guessing, have have objtool read the compiler output and
record the location for us. The compiler can generate whatever it likes.