Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 6 May 2020 16:53:11 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
Cc:     Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>, perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com,
        kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com, nicoleotsuka@gmail.com,
        alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, swarren@nvidia.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nwartikar@nvidia.com,
        lgirdwood@gmail.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com, viswanathl@nvidia.com,
        sharadg@nvidia.com, thierry.reding@gmail.com,
        atalambedu@nvidia.com, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
        digetx@gmail.com, rlokhande@nvidia.com, mkumard@nvidia.com,
        dramesh@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] DPCM for Tegra
Message-ID: <20200506155311.GG5299@sirena.org.uk>
References: <1588250483-10014-1-git-send-email-spujar@nvidia.com>
 <1jzhalffhh.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com>
 <fe842d81-22da-fbbe-b5e2-9872cefb9d8b@nvidia.com>
 <1jwo5pf7de.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BzCohdixPhurzSK4"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1jwo5pf7de.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


--BzCohdixPhurzSK4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 04:47:09PM +0200, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> On Wed 06 May 2020 at 16:12, Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com> wrote:

> > XBAR currently exports all routing widgets which can be used to
> > interconnect multiple components and thus implements Mux widgets. Fixing
> > the routing paths in driver would limit anyone to try a different
> > combination as per the need, unless driver is modified.

> I did not mean that you should restrict the routing ability of your SoC,
> quite the opposite actually.

> You should just expose it correctly

Yes, it's going to be less effort in the long run if nothing else.

--BzCohdixPhurzSK4
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl6y3WcACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9C+9wf9FhV0+uWoqDcuQBDbDmaqyavUV8uakHgopXF3Q9Ny3WMoj1EBaIpxOOM1
nFLZGkaXGkbOEDxuixc2ptvMvML5c8WccOrS3J9Ux6K16BbXpwjFsqClUrzpix0O
r40xsg0q81/pSxIFOWU0BKmFebz8wLG3NGGV2d7ZMW//kIG7LVAb8oB6epKkeKYY
sACMClQ7QsGOeWqteFWq91phXk4OL9KJ4SileYVgTcMBoeN8xgIytv+v7unCTKhk
aJALdHiBajto60CLYG6UPUoIZ3FRLWEoybSOdI7uQz2MmWctYmzn5OQu3lGGlM4l
XM3B0/3XWGsyGhK+XM1JqWoi9cz1tw==
=tJVE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--BzCohdixPhurzSK4--