Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751894AbWCIVh2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Mar 2006 16:37:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751901AbWCIVh2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Mar 2006 16:37:28 -0500 Received: from cust8446.nsw01.dataco.com.au ([203.171.93.254]:19122 "EHLO cust8446.nsw01.dataco.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751894AbWCIVh1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Mar 2006 16:37:27 -0500 From: Nigel Cunningham Organization: Cyclades Corporation To: Kasper Sandberg Subject: Re: [Suspend2-announce] Nigel's work and the future of Suspend2. Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 07:34:36 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Pavel Machek , Thomas Maier , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200603071005.56453.nigel@suspend2.net> <20060309114556.GE2813@elf.ucw.cz> <1141916144.1745.8.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1141916144.1745.8.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart15231004.bTIkignDcS"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200603100734.42562.ncunningham@cyclades.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1829 Lines: 55 --nextPart15231004.bTIkignDcS Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi. On Friday 10 March 2006 00:55, Kasper Sandberg wrote: > > Except that suspend2 is not going to be merged, for variety of > > reasons. One of them is that noone is working on merging it... > > one of them being the operative word, afaik, nigel was unwilling to work > on the issues needed for merging for the reason that it wouldnt be > merged.. Yes. The only reason I'm not going to commit myself to getting carried away= =20 with seeking to merge it is that you've clearly stated that you don't want = to=20 see it merged, and you haven't been overruled by other kernel maintainers=20 (with perhaps the occasional exception, sometimes privately). If they came= =20 along to the party and said "Pavel, get your act together. Suspend2 isn't a= s=20 invasive or ugly as you're making it out to be." (or something similar), I'= d=20 see some point to working on merging it. If they want to tell me to submit = it=20 again or prove that's the case, I'm more than willing to hear that. But whi= le=20 the only feedback is users saying "I wish it was merged" and Pavel saying=20 "Ain't going to happen", what am I meant to do? Regards, Nigel --nextPart15231004.bTIkignDcS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEEJ9yN0y+n1M3mo0RAm02AKDcbL2B0R6bUw33mhmm+yapKNpztwCgjqJg yrjlGceUfi1WePbbX58I16k= =//9G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart15231004.bTIkignDcS-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/