Received: by 2002:a25:23cc:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j195csp485284ybj; Thu, 7 May 2020 00:04:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLfsb5X1HdVQ4laNXfOa8R/yS5/TITp3rqJRu8gIiCe8nNcm+X6oUKnqZpTCNUscg/hJ/IE X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5608:: with SMTP id f8mr11102925ejq.190.1588835084297; Thu, 07 May 2020 00:04:44 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1588835084; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=yR6Ro1DQCjLuPPb6fFl8yh94/SvBkg6zeKGXWKSNh8kqeF/Gp4nt0rStbOQioF/+Sq +0ejQkJIuO0aQ61dVk0Tk7nagWYq5VN72gIQNFTMJJbQs+jRiCJBVu6+YLPvy+br96MQ RcQZVHz1UQILCQdBa8ixWEvpx+ud0rreWj3dIKPVF8LClMr4do8Z/wvByM2QVigJyomH gBUml2Vzb0Hwib3ZCCXq0rgPPP+d0A5G2ywOjuO04Rjzlrh0v1RryKfhdw8bZhODfBpf +5b5LJvH9pSk+xMNh6ZJ5ZBiTPQAShjH7o5h0J1JoSPlxV2aWtt3wvIVgb9KcRZZXGvh GX3A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from:ironport-sdr:ironport-sdr; bh=0zPKjYzJ4mujxOG4QKGtZdlyD+ubELKHDQ7nz46mrNo=; b=VA9Zi9KOFiaNRmsV/YPeCpmgnVatDMf5F4gGL99tg2PgFrur3DS6nDz+ZMyjfqyeRC UY9MkooE2emGHCKS3kzTa/L+bLiaiFs0uYhb8QPU3n4fa1b07B5gD/aLRugAb/JgkZaD pCfICSFAf0xST7RVi5ALOUhw12zZEaK5aUtqGVGLaO9hMLdXYkofIvE/GrUNALY/oxh2 eLKuSu5cgWF2PBfStXgIj2HRtWXKqVvtylU+B0YPECj5mleIubSZf8e94EWxMbOTqQ/T CTHESKr37mtI1VbjmXPM3ck38rUv5Tv0iG2RXATfX0dyMizy9bMvl9FTfLURGPx2ratW dacw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l16si2610427ejq.268.2020.05.07.00.04.21; Thu, 07 May 2020 00:04:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726542AbgEGHAa (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 7 May 2020 03:00:30 -0400 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:18356 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726320AbgEGHA1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2020 03:00:27 -0400 IronPort-SDR: kNyEyZe8xEq8uKMckz9BxS38bk9hAjUGI6ffpHElqF6ENDidnd0CLUsBrVoJG01foO2Wf0fsln ofd/bCss6Xwg== X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 May 2020 00:00:27 -0700 IronPort-SDR: Q//iwPQJInuUFkbbb4hY0VVLOavA/Jv1JtZINKfvc6FMgJjATo9Cn4OmBtfLYnIPDRXtkOAc+h Ta81sKCOgMVA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,362,1583222400"; d="scan'208";a="370026087" Received: from kbl-ppc.sh.intel.com ([10.239.159.118]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 May 2020 00:00:23 -0700 From: Jin Yao To: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com Cc: Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com, kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com, Jin Yao Subject: [PATCH v3 1/4] perf stat: Fix wrong per-thread runtime stat for interval mode Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 14:58:19 +0800 Message-Id: <20200507065822.8255-2-yao.jin@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20200507065822.8255-1-yao.jin@linux.intel.com> References: <20200507065822.8255-1-yao.jin@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org root@kbl-ppc:~# perf stat --per-thread -e cycles,instructions -I1000 --interval-count 2 1.004171683 perf-3696 8,747,311 cycles ... 1.004171683 perf-3696 691,730 instructions # 0.08 insn per cycle ... 2.006490373 perf-3696 1,749,936 cycles ... 2.006490373 perf-3696 1,484,582 instructions # 0.28 insn per cycle ... Let's see interval 2.006490373 perf-3696 1,749,936 cycles perf-3696 1,484,582 instructions # 0.28 insn per cycle insn per cycle = 1,484,582 / 1,749,936 = 0.85. But now it's 0.28, that's not correct. stat_config.stats[] records the per-thread runtime stat. But for interval mode, it should be reset for each interval. So now, with this patch, root@kbl-ppc:~# perf stat --per-thread -e cycles,instructions -I1000 --interval-count 2 1.005818121 perf-8633 9,898,045 cycles ... 1.005818121 perf-8633 693,298 instructions # 0.07 insn per cycle ... 2.007863743 perf-8633 1,551,619 cycles ... 2.007863743 perf-8633 1,317,514 instructions # 0.85 insn per cycle ... Let's check interval 2.007863743. insn per cycle = 1,317,514 / 1,551,619 = 0.85. It's correct. Fixes: commit 14e72a21c783 ("perf stat: Update or print per-thread stats") Signed-off-by: Jin Yao --- tools/perf/builtin-stat.c | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c index e0c1ad23c768..97ee941649e6 100644 --- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c @@ -351,6 +351,16 @@ static void read_counters(struct timespec *rs) } } +static void thread_stats_reset(struct perf_stat_config *config) +{ + int i; + + if (config->stats) { + for (i = 0; i < config->stats_num; i++) + perf_stat__reset_shadow_per_stat(&config->stats[i]); + } +} + static void process_interval(void) { struct timespec ts, rs; @@ -359,6 +369,7 @@ static void process_interval(void) diff_timespec(&rs, &ts, &ref_time); perf_stat__reset_shadow_per_stat(&rt_stat); + thread_stats_reset(&stat_config); read_counters(&rs); if (STAT_RECORD) { -- 2.17.1