Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 7 May 2020 12:15:17 +0200
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
        "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>,
        Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "bibo,mao" <bibo.mao@intel.com>,
        "Ziqian SUN (Zamir)" <zsun@redhat.com>, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] kretprobe: Prevent triggering kretprobe from within
 kprobe_flush_task
Message-ID: <20200507101517.GB2447905@krava>
References: <20200410093159.0d7000a08fd76c2eaf1398f8@kernel.org>
 <20200414160338.GE208694@krava>
 <20200415090507.GG208694@krava>
 <20200416105506.904b7847a1b621b75463076d@kernel.org>
 <20200416091320.GA322899@krava>
 <20200416224250.7a53fb581e50aa32df75a0cf@kernel.org>
 <20200416143104.GA400699@krava>
 <20200417163810.ffe5c9145eae281fc493932c@kernel.org>
 <20200428213627.GI1476763@krava>
 <20200501110107.bc859c6603704c0bcdb8889a@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200501110107.bc859c6603704c0bcdb8889a@kernel.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 11:01:07AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 23:36:27 +0200
> Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 04:38:10PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > 
> > SNIP
> > 
> > > > 
> > > > The code within the kretprobe handler checks for probe reentrancy,
> > > > so we won't trigger any _raw_spin_lock_irqsave probe in there.
> > > > 
> > > > The problem is in outside kprobe_flush_task, where we call:
> > > > 
> > > >   kprobe_flush_task
> > > >     kretprobe_table_lock
> > > >       raw_spin_lock_irqsave
> > > >         _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
> > > > 
> > > > where _raw_spin_lock_irqsave triggers the kretprobe and installs
> > > > kretprobe_trampoline handler on _raw_spin_lock_irqsave return.
> > > > 
> > > > The kretprobe_trampoline handler is then executed with already
> > > > locked kretprobe_table_locks, and first thing it does is to
> > > > lock kretprobe_table_locks ;-) the whole lockup path like:
> > > > 
> > > >   kprobe_flush_task
> > > >     kretprobe_table_lock
> > > >       raw_spin_lock_irqsave
> > > >         _raw_spin_lock_irqsave ---> probe triggered, kretprobe_trampoline installed
> > > > 
> > > >         ---> kretprobe_table_locks locked
> > > > 
> > > >         kretprobe_trampoline
> > > >           trampoline_handler
> > > >             kretprobe_hash_lock(current, &head, &flags);  <--- deadlock
> > > > 
> > > > Adding kprobe_busy_begin/end helpers that mark code with fake
> > > > probe installed to prevent triggering of another kprobe within
> > > > this code.
> > > > 
> > > > Using these helpers in kprobe_flush_task, so the probe recursion
> > > > protection check is hit and the probe is never set to prevent
> > > > above lockup.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Thanks Jiri!
> > > 
> > > Ingo, could you pick this up?
> > 
> > Ingo, any chance you could take this one?
> 
> Hi Ingo,
> 
> Should I make a pull request for all kprobes related patches to you?

looks like Ingo is offline, Thomas, could you please pull this one?

thanks,
jirka