Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arch/x86: Rename config
 X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS to generic x86
To:     Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc:     corbet@lwn.net, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
        hpa@zytor.com, sean.j.christopherson@intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
        vkuznets@redhat.com, wanpengli@tencent.com, jmattson@google.com,
        joro@8bytes.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, luto@kernel.org,
        peterz@infradead.org, mchehab+samsung@kernel.org,
        changbin.du@intel.com, namit@vmware.com,
        yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com, asteinhauser@google.com,
        anshuman.khandual@arm.com, jan.kiszka@siemens.com,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, steven.price@arm.com,
        rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com, peterx@redhat.com,
        dan.j.williams@intel.com, arjunroy@google.com, logang@deltatee.com,
        thellstrom@vmware.com, aarcange@redhat.com, justin.he@arm.com,
        robin.murphy@arm.com, ira.weiny@intel.com, keescook@chromium.org,
        jgross@suse.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
        pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com,
        vineela.tummalapalli@intel.com, yamada.masahiro@socionext.com,
        sam@ravnborg.org, acme@redhat.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
References: <158880240546.11615.2219410169137148044.stgit@naples-babu.amd.com>
 <158880253347.11615.8499618616856685179.stgit@naples-babu.amd.com>
 <4d86b207-77af-dc5d-88a4-f092be0043f6@intel.com>
 <20200507072934.d5l6cpqyy54lrrla@linutronix.de>
 <034cfb90-7f75-8e36-5b1e-ceaef0dfa50d@intel.com>
 <1aca7824-f917-c027-ef02-d3a9e7780c3b@redhat.com>
 <4ca2dd51-c30a-c400-146a-8079ac4526c6@amd.com>
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <97773339-adf6-eab4-fbbc-4e20bbb7e024@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 7 May 2020 18:07:20 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4ca2dd51-c30a-c400-146a-8079ac4526c6@amd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 07/05/20 18:06, Babu Moger wrote:
>>> So, for now my preference would be to change the prompt, but leave the
>>> CONFIG_ naming in place.
>> I agree.
>>
>> What's in a name?  An Intel rose by any other name would smell as sweet.
> 
> How about X86_MPK? Or I will use already proposed name
> X86_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS.

Dave is proposing to keep the CONFIG_ as is and only change the prompt.

Paolo