Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 23:18:06 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <20060309.231806.10212645.davem@davemloft.net>
To: mst@mellanox.co.il
Cc: rdreier@cisco.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       openib-general@openib.org, shemminger@osdl.org
Subject: Re: TSO and IPoIB performance degradation
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <20060310001031.GA19040@mellanox.co.il>
References: <20060308125311.GE17618@mellanox.co.il>
	<20060309.154819.104282952.davem@davemloft.net>
	<20060310001031.GA19040@mellanox.co.il>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 656
Lines: 15

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@mellanox.co.il>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 02:10:31 +0200

> But with the change we are discussing, could an ack now be sent even
> sooner than we have at least two full sized segments?  Or does
> __tcp_ack_snd_check delay until we have at least two full sized
> segments? David, could you explain please?

__tcp_ack_snd_check() delays until we have at least two full
sized segments.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/