Received: by 2002:a25:23cc:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j195csp1101293ybj; Thu, 7 May 2020 15:00:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJHKK9gsSE4LX58uhKIHwSmnHq2d6MCTt/Ev0yCTy4Wvpr1uMJ1s/PrdnkMuZDmxPLV1O/r X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d4cd:: with SMTP id t13mr13931131edr.30.1588888849913; Thu, 07 May 2020 15:00:49 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1588888849; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=VKoJI/n+y27KC7w+p+U1WTKmz6LAn8rTD4JL7nc92ekvbxBDHgrEFipLg5FNcRnImL 6ii5T+iZ3DlG5YbmLWgCx1ceBNkNd90DIutfwnDvoe8+sYFIQIsyabtyu1myUh5YnsxW E1TK+xgFYb5LwD23iYg1ihODcsaMXbaH5tWzEIFknoUEt/e6sTIKbFJbhSkLBcQ7MHbQ mFcMaDwsOI8kyUkkam2Q27cqPT3QXYP60JM2SQhbyXd/Uqgl0GtCU0miqf02w0YSRqPv x5s4tSzbAD8S1YPHcQqaMSBre9ImFGobO01Ak4+DWg9gml4rUdgwZH8mdX5R1ukf3iHm va8g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=YIdhd/O6VYCCThTyaA6We9R20n/Ae/tFi2XoFVio1ws=; b=hIQmtQW/+zsxA58D/ErKs0ZGPUxXGlX742r8273/5/mEjUznj68znup6xwt6YVD3Hw dfvSK9wfCHqKO7fQZeLBy7TP/Q8Du2C7agA1r5K9NtV2LtmhlMambcAq63EAgo6TPE2R cMkaLpX0RCEeF4GECmlJp2bgKpeLvMGngqLt36pkS0WgBKTzzqaUGiUF4e20bDxkBKTy x36ghYDFIE7l6BpJPIjWtoX3kd6r6ADlqMqgOUOEFtwZn16lnUwwBdFJO1j36Yx765lH 8xPulG939p/Npd6cOrYsaD4itqFN0Oy4oT7dEfR8/+WEMVTyZRGneK/mXpiLdQEHB2Ib fLKw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=cz71TAgu; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h4si4177673edn.445.2020.05.07.15.00.26; Thu, 07 May 2020 15:00:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=cz71TAgu; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726761AbgEGV6a (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 7 May 2020 17:58:30 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.120]:52315 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726437AbgEGV6a (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2020 17:58:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1588888708; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=YIdhd/O6VYCCThTyaA6We9R20n/Ae/tFi2XoFVio1ws=; b=cz71TAguzSLFarGW6WObXNFwT+SyzAJhNN4PSTRa/Ifq4te4z+TvXdSLDhL4BNCrsEch4L Ee47yNAGCL6+2N5pSON13KIpeJJpFMtKWzJGB9Z0647NlzHu0WM2FwxUTXW8n1s/nRyrFt XtA2Eit8XN5xOlwT4j+Bd0mkwLTOj8U= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-352-tmgfVTAMOJGL0jzKrrXf8g-1; Thu, 07 May 2020 17:58:23 -0400 X-MC-Unique: tmgfVTAMOJGL0jzKrrXf8g-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B38718B649E; Thu, 7 May 2020 21:58:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from madcap2.tricolour.ca (unknown [10.3.128.9]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D00B21001B07; Thu, 7 May 2020 21:58:15 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 17:58:13 -0400 From: Richard Guy Briggs To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Cc: Paul Moore , Eric Paris , linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] audit: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array Message-ID: <20200507215812.ksvwcykfged7ye2a@madcap2.tricolour.ca> References: <20200507185041.GA13930@embeddedor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200507185041.GA13930@embeddedor> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2020-05-07 13:50, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language > extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare > variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], > introduced in C99: > > struct foo { > int stuff; > struct boo array[]; > }; > > By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning > in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which > will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being > inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. > > Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by > this change: > > "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator > may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of > zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] > > sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array > members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in > which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to > zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding > some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also > help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues. > > This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. > > [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html > [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 > [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Sounds reasonable to me. There's another in include/uapi/linux/audit.h in struct audit_rule_data buf[0]. This alert also helped me fix another one in a patchset I'm about to post (and will probably cause a merge conflict but we can figure that out). Reviewed-by: Richard Guy Briggs > --- > include/linux/audit.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/audit.h b/include/linux/audit.h > index f9ceae57ca8d..2b63aee6e9fa 100644 > --- a/include/linux/audit.h > +++ b/include/linux/audit.h > @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ > struct audit_sig_info { > uid_t uid; > pid_t pid; > - char ctx[0]; > + char ctx[]; > }; > > struct audit_buffer; > > > -- > Linux-audit mailing list > Linux-audit@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit - RGB -- Richard Guy Briggs Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada IRC: rgb, SunRaycer Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635