Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932297AbWCJHwX (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2006 02:52:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932328AbWCJHwW (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2006 02:52:22 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:52642 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932297AbWCJHwW (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2006 02:52:22 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/03] Unmapped: Separate unmapped and mapped pages From: Arjan van de Ven To: Magnus Damm Cc: Linux Kernel , linux-mm@kvack.org In-Reply-To: <20060310034412.8340.90939.sendpatchset@cherry.local> References: <20060310034412.8340.90939.sendpatchset@cherry.local> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 08:52:18 +0100 Message-Id: <1141977139.2876.15.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 488 Lines: 15 > Apply on top of 2.6.16-rc5. > > Comments? my big worry with a split LRU is: how do you keep fairness and balance between those LRUs? This is one of the things that made the 2.4 VM suck really badly, so I really wouldn't want this bad... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/