Received: by 2002:a25:23cc:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j195csp1436135ybj; Fri, 8 May 2020 01:02:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypK6eQ4wgDPUDpwy3Xm9cPQuKsxCIqf9EidIuXIR4BUQw87bVh5d/OZJgM9cEO+k/hKQk+NI X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cdfa:: with SMTP id p26mr14540889wmj.186.1588924927867; Fri, 08 May 2020 01:02:07 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1588924927; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=k1SNRF6o1Yv5DqufS3VlIrnIpt/POcUxzGVVmeDOztF6ZezlGCYXOxG2C1HkUTboBT MqRFzxDV7wQLxefFVMd5teChMNdEJ9oJZr/Nk5hDlnYKl3NRS9+0AWLXsLH4c44CUOFt A+Dbq7LjD8brOosURtYJE+Mg7/XO1eJr0zuvbNgaU+u70iMWH+hjGkk2au/G/Xg+d+Gu S1UdO6TGbGxghwD3EQVoaNIjgp91aGT+2MmuvNAmuJYVHVQfdzujPJZEOMKRlX5aYNgv fJiaZHjLS75Jt4C/MrZVbx7qlPRlFzivb74XDG2f0ncXeth7GjHShTdbkkhLXph9L9FL N6Ow== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from:ironport-sdr:ironport-sdr; bh=qB4g/0OK2M95amCUha+5o5M/2DyWX/7BtQICnnkR5QY=; b=SJT7smsdP5uu44miXw3aE74nTRn5+UnKbxbgGKCO4/OpDj920NdqDKASLh4Gi9jE+5 KBaq8iPEABhlOQLTCVKemY+WqYj16XgAOcI2lJ9cyfWCI0lFKcw/oNaFfZRwaw+774ct fFyXhNoK0TP+u8KsL0UIdTzwMfSuaN3qfqEwrGr/SPZR6CTl3LOsW52SUfvCln55OCzH GlOKyWz3fypsYVZNvS0BuL2+ykMezFZLZuqkRkg00w7Rncx1Sx6oLu9OzQ0bZfu1JtgV EpfX1nFLD5IBG93LQmgYwiznhbmV5ceJDIb1ZHA5vlF5E7q9imceBmvEjgACrAh0XBW3 uRoQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q9si556427edn.501.2020.05.08.01.01.45; Fri, 08 May 2020 01:02:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726873AbgEHIAY (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 8 May 2020 04:00:24 -0400 Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]:29311 "EHLO mga18.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726036AbgEHIAW (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 May 2020 04:00:22 -0400 IronPort-SDR: Ul6q7JHpntXZ2h6fwZZsd+TgfCe84204Bq+JQbHzxevEnZyB3UNN0JzS+vboLjuhTzfAtgIrXl Y2G5Renk7YeQ== X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 May 2020 01:00:22 -0700 IronPort-SDR: 9mzErrvG2TaqRuhY8XcXUXgaBn+DkGGSkRQ3XXprwTOUoeRgVLRvQ3ncoPjZv7Th0ojmdqeg7G gjwpgnTUXU5g== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,366,1583222400"; d="scan'208";a="370372874" Received: from kbl-ppc.sh.intel.com ([10.239.159.118]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 May 2020 01:00:19 -0700 From: Jin Yao To: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com Cc: Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com, kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com, Jin Yao Subject: [PATCH v4 1/4] perf stat: Fix wrong per-thread runtime stat for interval mode Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 15:58:14 +0800 Message-Id: <20200508075817.10588-2-yao.jin@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20200508075817.10588-1-yao.jin@linux.intel.com> References: <20200508075817.10588-1-yao.jin@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org root@kbl-ppc:~# perf stat --per-thread -e cycles,instructions -I1000 --interval-count 2 1.004171683 perf-3696 8,747,311 cycles ... 1.004171683 perf-3696 691,730 instructions # 0.08 insn per cycle ... 2.006490373 perf-3696 1,749,936 cycles ... 2.006490373 perf-3696 1,484,582 instructions # 0.28 insn per cycle ... Let's see interval 2.006490373 perf-3696 1,749,936 cycles perf-3696 1,484,582 instructions # 0.28 insn per cycle insn per cycle = 1,484,582 / 1,749,936 = 0.85. But now it's 0.28, that's not correct. stat_config.stats[] records the per-thread runtime stat. But for interval mode, it should be reset for each interval. So now, with this patch, root@kbl-ppc:~# perf stat --per-thread -e cycles,instructions -I1000 --interval-count 2 1.005818121 perf-8633 9,898,045 cycles ... 1.005818121 perf-8633 693,298 instructions # 0.07 insn per cycle ... 2.007863743 perf-8633 1,551,619 cycles ... 2.007863743 perf-8633 1,317,514 instructions # 0.85 insn per cycle ... Let's check interval 2.007863743. insn per cycle = 1,317,514 / 1,551,619 = 0.85. It's correct. This patch creates runtime_stat_reset, places it next to untime_stat_new/runtime_stat_delete and moves all runtime_stat functions before process_interval. v4: --- Create runtime_stat_reset. Fixes: commit 14e72a21c783 ("perf stat: Update or print per-thread stats") Signed-off-by: Jin Yao --- tools/perf/builtin-stat.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c index e0c1ad23c768..f3b3a59ac7d2 100644 --- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c @@ -351,6 +351,46 @@ static void read_counters(struct timespec *rs) } } +static int runtime_stat_new(struct perf_stat_config *config, int nthreads) +{ + int i; + + config->stats = calloc(nthreads, sizeof(struct runtime_stat)); + if (!config->stats) + return -1; + + config->stats_num = nthreads; + + for (i = 0; i < nthreads; i++) + runtime_stat__init(&config->stats[i]); + + return 0; +} + +static void runtime_stat_delete(struct perf_stat_config *config) +{ + int i; + + if (!config->stats) + return; + + for (i = 0; i < config->stats_num; i++) + runtime_stat__exit(&config->stats[i]); + + zfree(&config->stats); +} + +static void runtime_stat_reset(struct perf_stat_config *config) +{ + int i; + + if (!config->stats) + return; + + for (i = 0; i < config->stats_num; i++) + perf_stat__reset_shadow_per_stat(&config->stats[i]); +} + static void process_interval(void) { struct timespec ts, rs; @@ -359,6 +399,7 @@ static void process_interval(void) diff_timespec(&rs, &ts, &ref_time); perf_stat__reset_shadow_per_stat(&rt_stat); + runtime_stat_reset(&stat_config); read_counters(&rs); if (STAT_RECORD) { @@ -1737,35 +1778,6 @@ int process_cpu_map_event(struct perf_session *session, return set_maps(st); } -static int runtime_stat_new(struct perf_stat_config *config, int nthreads) -{ - int i; - - config->stats = calloc(nthreads, sizeof(struct runtime_stat)); - if (!config->stats) - return -1; - - config->stats_num = nthreads; - - for (i = 0; i < nthreads; i++) - runtime_stat__init(&config->stats[i]); - - return 0; -} - -static void runtime_stat_delete(struct perf_stat_config *config) -{ - int i; - - if (!config->stats) - return; - - for (i = 0; i < config->stats_num; i++) - runtime_stat__exit(&config->stats[i]); - - zfree(&config->stats); -} - static const char * const stat_report_usage[] = { "perf stat report []", NULL, -- 2.17.1