Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 8 May 2020 13:33:36 +0200
From:   Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@redhat.com>
To:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kconfig: default to CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_PERFORMANCE_O3 for
 gcc >= 10
Message-ID: <20200508113336.2vdfdnc6tqyx4pu6@butterfly.localdomain>
References: <20200507224530.2993316-1-Jason@zx2c4.com>
 <20200508090202.7s3kcqpvpxx32syu@butterfly.localdomain>
 <CAHmME9pTZTa9AEUL0-ojTr7P-F7NYe8OR9=-GBPaQNpnSDrEiw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHmME9pTZTa9AEUL0-ojTr7P-F7NYe8OR9=-GBPaQNpnSDrEiw@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 05:21:47AM -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > Should we untangle -O3 from depending on ARC first maybe?
> 
> Oh, hah, good point. Yes, I'll do that for a v2, but will wait another
> day for feedback first.

Just keep in mind that my previous attempt [1] failed because of too
many false positive warnings despite -O3 really uncovered a couple of
bugs in the codebase.

Lets hope your attempt will be more successfull. I'll happily offer my
review tag ;).

Also Cc'ing Andrew who (IIRC) tried to took my sumbission and Arnd who
tried to clean up the mess afterwards.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191211104619.114557-1-oleksandr@redhat.com/

-- 
  Best regards,
    Oleksandr Natalenko (post-factum)
    Principal Software Maintenance Engineer