Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751330AbWCJO3n (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2006 09:29:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751323AbWCJO3n (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2006 09:29:43 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:9921 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751221AbWCJO3m (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2006 09:29:42 -0500 Subject: Re: Serial Attached SCSI, An Architecture For Linux From: Arjan van de Ven To: dougg@torque.net Cc: ltuikov@yahoo.com, linux-scsi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <44118AA8.2020106@torque.net> References: <20060310072722.96803.qmail@web31802.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <44118AA8.2020106@torque.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 15:29:37 +0100 Message-Id: <1142000977.2876.54.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1554 Lines: 36 On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 09:18 -0500, Douglas Gilbert wrote: > Luben Tuikov wrote: > > Me, early Jan'06: Paper submitted. > > Linuxsymposium, 16 Feb 2006 : Paper approved. > > Linuxsymposium, date unknown: Silently moved to a BOF, I was never notified. > > Me, 9 Mar 2006 : BOF rejected by me because last year I did held a SAS BOF. > > Linuxsymposium, 9 Mar 2006 : moved back to a paper. > > Linuxsymposium, 9 Mar 2006 : paper rejected. > > > > Serial Attached SCSI, An Architecture For Linux > > On the face of it, the Ottawa Linux Symposium has some > explaining to do. This following quote is from: > http://www.linuxsymposium.org/2006/cfp.php > > "Step 2 Committee Review" > > "The programme committee will review your proposal per > the guidelines above. Notification of acceptance or > rejection will be sent by February 15th, 2006." I can understand a rejection; I mean, last year there was already a BOF about the topic, which makes the "newness" of the talk less. In weighing the undoubtedly very many proposals, the OLS committee needs to make hard choices obviously; and I can see the point of preferring new talks over talks which cover a topic that was discussed the year before. that to me doesn't sound like a conspiracy, but just running a conference sanely. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/