Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 18:36:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 18:36:08 -0400 Received: from jalon.able.es ([212.97.163.2]:7140 "EHLO jalon.able.es") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 18:35:10 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 00:35:55 +0200 From: "J . A . Magallon" To: Alan Cox Cc: "Michael T . Babcock" , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: VM Message-ID: <20011023003555.A25439@werewolf.able.es> In-Reply-To: <3BD420ED.4090508@fibrespeed.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT In-Reply-To: ; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 16:02:49 +0200 X-Mailer: Balsa 1.2.1 Lines: 17 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 20011022 Alan Cox wrote: >> I have never done this comparison myself, but I was wondering how ugly >> it would be if stable versions of Andrea's and Rik's VMs were both >> available in your/Linus' kernel as compile-time options. Assuming that >> each provides better performance under certain conditions, wouldn't > >Too ugly for words. >- and how about a CONFIG_ ?? So -ac patch size will become manageable again. -- J.A. Magallon # Let the source be with you... mailto:jamagallon@able.es Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586 Linux werewolf 2.4.12-ac5-beo #1 SMP Mon Oct 22 02:05:06 CEST 2001 i686 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/