Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751805AbWCJQZB (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2006 11:25:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751811AbWCJQZB (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2006 11:25:01 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:7130 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751805AbWCJQZA (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2006 11:25:00 -0500 Subject: Re: Revenge of the sysfs maintainer! (was Re: [PATCH 8 of 20] ipath - sysfs support for core driver) From: Arjan van de Ven To: "Bryan O'Sullivan" Cc: Greg KH , Roland Dreier , rolandd@cisco.com, akpm@osdl.org, davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org In-Reply-To: <1142006121.29925.5.camel@serpentine.pathscale.com> References: <1141947143.10693.40.camel@serpentine.pathscale.com> <20060310003513.GA17050@suse.de> <1141951589.10693.84.camel@serpentine.pathscale.com> <20060310010050.GA9945@suse.de> <1141966693.14517.20.camel@camp4.serpentine.com> <1141977431.2876.18.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1141998702.28926.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1141999569.2876.47.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1142006121.29925.5.camel@serpentine.pathscale.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:24:52 +0100 Message-Id: <1142007892.2876.66.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1094 Lines: 27 On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 07:55 -0800, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote: > On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 15:06 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > > They mightn't be exactly today's kernels, but they're no more than two > > > or three weeks old. CONFIG_DEBUG_FS has been in the kernel for a long > > > time, and it's still not being picked up. > > > > but it's a module; you can ship it no problem yourself if you go through > > the hell of shipping external modules > > Yes, we can ship it ourselves. But a significant point of this exercise > is to have the drivers be available to people who use unmodified > distros, and don't want to download other bits to do so. well shipping one .ko or two .ko's... same difference. Or maybe in your case it's a 4->5 transition. No Difference from a user point of view. So sorry I'm not buying your argument very much. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/