Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 8 May 2020 14:18:04 +0100
From:   Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, x86@kernel.org,
        hpa@zytor.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        rafael@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
        vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
        rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
        mcgrof@kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org, yzaikin@google.com,
        fweisbec@gmail.com, tkjos@google.com, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] Modularize schedutil
Message-ID: <20200508131804.GC10541@google.com>
References: <20200507181012.29791-1-qperret@google.com>
 <20200508053359.ul5dbws6vkpdrbef@vireshk-i7>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200508053359.ul5dbws6vkpdrbef@vireshk-i7>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Viresh,

On Friday 08 May 2020 at 11:03:59 (+0530), Viresh Kumar wrote:
> IMHO, you have over-broken the patches, like first two could be merged
> together and all exports could have been done in a single patch, etc.
> i.e. all related or similar changes together...

Right, I don't mind squashing the first patches. For the exports, I'm
guessing they'll need a case by case discussion, so it's probably
reasonable to keep them separate, at least for now.

> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Thanks!
Quentin