Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 8 May 2020 12:05:32 -0400
From:   Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To:     Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cohuck@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] vfio/type1: Support faulting PFNMAP vmas
Message-ID: <20200508160532.GB228260@xz-x1>
References: <158871401328.15589.17598154478222071285.stgit@gimli.home>
 <158871568480.15589.17339878308143043906.stgit@gimli.home>
 <20200507212443.GO228260@xz-x1>
 <20200507235421.GK26002@ziepe.ca>
 <20200508021939.GT228260@xz-x1>
 <20200508121013.GO26002@ziepe.ca>
 <20200508143042.GY228260@xz-x1>
 <20200508150540.GP26002@ziepe.ca>
 <20200508094213.0183c645@w520.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200508094213.0183c645@w520.home>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 09:42:13AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> Thanks for the discussion.  I gather then that this patch is correct as
> written, which probably also mean the patch Peter linked for KVM should
> not be applied since the logic is the same there.  Correct?  Thanks,

Right.  I've already replied yesterday in that thread so Paolo unqueue that
patch too.  Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu