Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/sonic: Fix some resource leaks in error handling
 paths
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc:     davem@davemloft.net, fthain@telegraphics.com.au,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
References: <20200508172557.218132-1-christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
 <20200508185402.41d9d068@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
From:   Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Message-ID: <50ef36cd-d095-9abe-26ea-d363d11ce521@wanadoo.fr>
Date:   Sat, 9 May 2020 18:47:08 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200508185402.41d9d068@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Le 09/05/2020 à 03:54, Jakub Kicinski a écrit :
> On Fri,  8 May 2020 19:25:57 +0200 Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>> @@ -527,8 +531,9 @@ static int mac_sonic_platform_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   	struct sonic_local* lp = netdev_priv(dev);
>>   
>>   	unregister_netdev(dev);
>> -	dma_free_coherent(lp->device, SIZEOF_SONIC_DESC * SONIC_BUS_SCALE(lp->dma_bitmode),
>> -	                  lp->descriptors, lp->descriptors_laddr);
>> +	dma_free_coherent(lp->device,
>> +			  SIZEOF_SONIC_DESC * SONIC_BUS_SCALE(lp->dma_bitmode),
>> +			  lp->descriptors, lp->descriptors_laddr);
>>   	free_netdev(dev);
>>   
>>   	return 0;
> This is a white-space only change, right? Since this is a fix we should
> avoid making cleanups which are not strictly necessary.
>
Right.

The reason of this clean-up is that I wanted to avoid a checkpatch 
warning with the proposed patch and I felt that having the same layout 
in the error handling path of the probe function and in the remove 
function was clearer.
So I updated also the remove function.

Fell free to ignore this hunk if not desired. I will not sent a V2 only 
for that.

CJ