Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932427AbWCKEUD (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2006 23:20:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932429AbWCKEUD (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2006 23:20:03 -0500 Received: from mx.pathscale.com ([64.160.42.68]:5791 "EHLO mx.pathscale.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932427AbWCKEUB (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Mar 2006 23:20:01 -0500 Subject: Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 0 of 20] [RFC] ipath driver - another round for review From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" To: Grant Grundler Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , akpm@osdl.org, gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org, davem@davemloft.net In-Reply-To: <20060310223041.GA15307@esmail.cup.hp.com> References: <20060310153559.GA12778@mellanox.co.il> <1142006537.29925.13.camel@serpentine.pathscale.com> <20060310174806.GA13969@esmail.cup.hp.com> <1142013259.29925.69.camel@serpentine.pathscale.com> <20060310223041.GA15307@esmail.cup.hp.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 20:20:21 -0800 Message-Id: <1142050821.31097.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.5.90 (2.5.90-2.1) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 762 Lines: 26 On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 14:30 -0800, Grant Grundler wrote: > > We already implement SDP. > > ah ok. > Is your SDP slower than the "ethernet emulation" for message passing? I don't recall off the top of my head. > You missed the netdev and netfilter guys ranting when Infiniband > promoters proprosed putting a switch in the kernel to bypass > the TCP/IP stack when SDP was available. No, I saw that happen. The ipath_ether driver doesn't bypass anything in any way. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/