Received: by 2002:a25:868d:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z13csp1839769ybk; Mon, 11 May 2020 05:39:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypL0rlyXpjvY7ZaKtjwmJBigDZFJUxZGasQNbJUam6sjE89Far0SzE81ZbJlD8e1n6MEPOgg X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:21cc:: with SMTP id bi12mr13242003edb.294.1589200774420; Mon, 11 May 2020 05:39:34 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1589200774; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=a3xCVUbLQOWsOknWcImft1Tjmnc++cFib5kx0Aay1/mzDPuzF64x1BRYOV4Xp11L+y JeiOJEreS39DTtyDb1J0p5MUcTi9XYJaPPtnyDaep3bBIyA9h8eFnjGKsDnzlWSg4w4B dTqw42ADUZNUG/pFeQG15W/7HwkRlJvCO2w2n52sgX56ayFbpj1gOKTY5YvDjxnAyO9Y Sc9EgLjutzW1LJ7DGwUYgOzL97fRhUW4jIaY0ToUOY4MEQt4IRMnBDxIIFQQ843QEaYi jBPCn8NkQGZ/1IV8AAEtTUmgfvrKWte+sV9j9f8RM2zWWw1F8GpvVwFBgIpzNF1p64S7 ZebQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from; bh=CkyN7ZfLJlECxzUWx1hr5qT1xIioGxo5QNmlWGWVpTI=; b=S66NwfNS8sVYukkVLHZpBlruTCNwmF/aYzoec+pyjRv3bjLwsBuPsOvJNJd61lg7yM YyrJlqY3swEBVFUWDBFen3kCc3HUSlOVBiJuHaEmbRPbJAG06ScGDJKyDnWPihsjFFV6 yrM7oUeCiG9CsCLaaPQyRSV4EhptP+AeqLBqY47SwxDRpr6NlwH93mImXNP9Lw3YRIn5 oJNFSEZOh6Q6H3H2PWhDWZOMoZwvnaxYaN/7Ven0sDwXGgrX+WArSl1FmoGK5twTMgfy T2qFF+guPncjfhjG+Juvlkk2SnzdKr6sgcRgmIOAall8gqN6AmYy3iJrsl8I8Gr+wB9P zSvQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g2si2935986edq.421.2020.05.11.05.39.11; Mon, 11 May 2020 05:39:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730025AbgEKMe6 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 11 May 2020 08:34:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49768 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727019AbgEKMe5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2020 08:34:57 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92356C061A0C for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 05:34:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p5de0bf0b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.224.191.11] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jY7dq-0005NH-GU; Mon, 11 May 2020 14:34:42 +0200 Received: by nanos.tec.linutronix.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DE8FAFFBF8; Mon, 11 May 2020 14:34:41 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Radoslaw Biernacki , Paul Menzel Cc: x86@kernel.org, Ross Zwisler , Daniel Drake , Andy Lutomirski , Borislav Petkov , "H . Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Len Brown , Linux Upstreaming Team , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Thorsten Leemhuis , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/tsc: Use hard-coded crystal clock for Skylake mobile In-Reply-To: References: <20200509113717.9084-1-pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de> <87eerr3ppb.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 14:34:41 +0200 Message-ID: <87y2py6466.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Radoslaw Biernacki writes: > We found that regression only on specific SKU which was used in one > model of ChromeBook. > What's interesting is that some other SKU is fine. > > The consequences of this are rather not trivial, > so this was considered a quickfix and temporary till we develop > something better. > In contrast to ChromeOs, I know that there is no way of finding if > there are in fact regressions on generic kernel in the field (this is > SKU dependent), > but we also think that this problem should be addressed in a better > way (if possible). Fix the BIOS to setup the CPUID/MSRs correctly? Thanks, tglx