Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Ma Feng <mafeng.ma@huawei.com>
To:     <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
CC:     <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: topology: make cpu_corepower_mask static
Date:   Mon, 11 May 2020 20:44:55 +0800
Message-ID: <1589201095-12884-1-git-send-email-mafeng.ma@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Fix sparse warning:

arch/arm/kernel/topology.c:184:22: warning: symbol 'cpu_corepower_mask'
was not declared. Should it be static?

Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Ma Feng <mafeng.ma@huawei.com>
---
 arch/arm/kernel/topology.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
index b5adaf7..563fdaa 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ static inline void update_cpu_capacity(unsigned int cpuid) {}
  * The current assumption is that we can power gate each core independently.
  * This will be superseded by DT binding once available.
  */
-const struct cpumask *cpu_corepower_mask(int cpu)
+static const struct cpumask *cpu_corepower_mask(int cpu)
 {
 	return &cpu_topology[cpu].thread_sibling;
 }
--
2.6.2