Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751340AbWCLD5I (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Mar 2006 22:57:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751354AbWCLD5H (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Mar 2006 22:57:07 -0500 Received: from xproxy.gmail.com ([66.249.82.198]:8547 "EHLO xproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751340AbWCLD5G convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Mar 2006 22:57:06 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cY7/IKCgbgBE/g3E9qF4tT3dEg/AgVfZ2oKTBExIdy8kftq6dUe2J1wCzAS3MgRsPp2CIx3oimzGasin3Ws2ccD/FrDwvN8p+5pzw40KMVkP+xqglL+jlQRplATcPXW0fhY5kCfg9FdcUDfhnAHXBZuCMoUHGilkPG+Zrv4g3DE= Message-ID: <161717d50603111957y5157e1fcne5c8656d80ee1a34@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 22:57:06 -0500 From: "Dave Neuer" To: "Eduard Bloch" Subject: Re: [future of drivers?] a proposal for binary drivers. Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060311005453.GA1494@debian> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <200603091509.06173.luke@dashjr.org> <441057D4.6030304@cfl.rr.com> <161717d50603090933o3df190f9vb1e06b0ec37deb8e@mail.gmail.com> <1141928755.7599.0.camel@bip.parateam.prv> <161717d50603091222p34b45065xdb8507cbf8191a3d@mail.gmail.com> <20060311005453.GA1494@debian> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1139 Lines: 25 On 3/10/06, Eduard Bloch wrote: > > Strongly following this attitude they need to expand the current > MODULE_LICENSE insanity into userspace. The are lots of evil powers, > using non-GPL-ed software which calls the holy GPLed syscall handlers. > > Honestly, using double standards this way sucks. The last strike I > stubled over was putting class device registration methods into the GPL > "enforcing" macros, cloacked as mandatory interface changes. > > This is no longer funny, it is on the same level as drawing a line > around the toilet box and saying: you cannot use it any longer, go and > piss somewhere else even if you have to search two hours for a suitable > place. I'm not sure how the analogy of a toilet fits either the linux kernel or the idea that I'm somehow obligated to work without compensation so some corporation can make a profit I get no share in. Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/