Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 19:27:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 19:26:56 -0400 Received: from mail201.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.58.141]:6613 "EHLO imf01bis.bellsouth.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 19:26:16 -0400 Message-ID: <3BD4AB4C.F4AD4FC0@mandrakesoft.com> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 19:27:08 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik Organization: MandrakeSoft X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.13-pre5 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Craig Dickson CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.2.20pre10 In-Reply-To: <20011022142302.A17992@crdic.ath.cx> <20011022151308.A18638@crdic.ath.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Craig Dickson wrote: > I really would like to see Linus comment on this. As a US resident, as > the owner of the Linux trademark, and as the development-branch leader > of kernel development, he's taking every "risk" Alan is, and more, > because he's here where the FBI could arrest him if it wanted to, while > Alan is thousands of miles away. So far, Linus has shown no indication, > AFAIK, that he intends to censor his changelogs. Why not? Is he truly > heedless of his own safety, or is he just too sensible to freak out > over such an implausible scenario? Linus' changelogs don't contain information that would need to be censored AFAICS. His changelogs are generally pretty terse. Jeff -- Jeff Garzik | Only so many songs can be sung Building 1024 | with two lips, two lungs, and one tongue. MandrakeSoft | - nomeansno - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/