Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
        Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch V5 part 3 12/29] x86/entry/common: Provide idtentry_enter/exit()
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrX6p6o0NJszjon7R8Tb+fFa=Jw5=CQQ56yZi+YVggopiQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20200505134354.774943181@linutronix.de> <20200505134904.457578656@linutronix.de> <CALCETrXwuxtZgniJxKZOy5ryqXSbbGMHMBwgEb400Pn9XpynzQ@mail.gmail.com> <874ksm7n5d.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <CALCETrX6p6o0NJszjon7R8Tb+fFa=Jw5=CQQ56yZi+YVggopiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 May 2020 20:42:14 +0200
Message-ID: <87o8qu5n5l.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> writes:
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 3:59 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>>
>> Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> writes:
>> >> + * Invoked by all exception/interrupt IDTENTRY handlers which are not
>> >> + * returning through the paranoid exit path (all except NMI, #DF and the IST
>> >> + * variants of #MC and #DB).
>> >
>
>> +void noinstr idtentry_exit(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> +{
>> +       lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
>> +
>> +       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_ENTRY))
>> +               WARN_ON_ONCE(!on_thread_stack());
>
> Whoops.  After sleeping on this, this is obviously wrong.  If this is
> something like a page fault, we can be on an IST or IRQ stack.
> Perhaps the actual condition should be:
>
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!on_thread_stack() && (regs->flags & X86_FLAGS_IF) &&
> preempt_count() == 0);
>
> IOW, the actual condition we want is that, if the idtenter_entry/exit
> code might schedule or if a cond_local_irq_enable() path might
> schedule, we had better be on the correct stack.
>
> Sorry for causing confusion.

Nothing to be sorry about. I could have thought about it myself :)
Let me try again.