Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751239AbWCMDcB (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Mar 2006 22:32:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751275AbWCMDcA (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Mar 2006 22:32:00 -0500 Received: from viper.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.4]:62885 "HELO viper.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751239AbWCMDcA (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Mar 2006 22:32:00 -0500 Subject: Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: 2.6.15-rt20, "bad page state", jackd (alsa 1.0.10 vs. recent kernels) From: Lee Revell To: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano Cc: Nick Piggin , cc@ccrma.Stanford.EDU, Takashi Iwai , alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Ingo Molnar , Heiko Carstens , Steven Rostedt , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <1142220385.7471.46.camel@cmn3.stanford.edu> References: <1141846564.5262.20.camel@cmn3.stanford.edu> <20060309084746.GB9408@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <1141938488.22708.28.camel@cmn3.stanford.edu> <4410B2D7.4090806@yahoo.com.au> <1141958866.22708.69.camel@cmn3.stanford.edu> <441109BC.9070705@yahoo.com.au> <1142016627.6124.33.camel@cmn3.stanford.edu> <44121351.2050703@yahoo.com.au> <1142210977.7471.27.camel@cmn3.stanford.edu> <4414DBFE.1050400@yahoo.com.au> <1142220385.7471.46.camel@cmn3.stanford.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 22:31:55 -0500 Message-Id: <1142220716.25358.273.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.5.92 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1160 Lines: 28 On Sun, 2006-03-12 at 19:26 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 13:42 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote: > > Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > > > > > Well, I found it. Finally. I diffed memalloc.c in the alsa kernel tree > > > with alsa stable 1.0.10 and googled for the obvious two chunks that > > > stood out :-) > > > > > > > Well, good work on tracking it down. I guess you should forward > > forward your patch to the ALSA guys. > > It fixes 1.0.10 with recent kernels but I guess 1.0.10 is old so maybe > it will not get patched (just a guess) - what would that be, 1.0.10a?. > 1.0.11rc3 did not trigger the problem in a quick test but I could swear > it did before, I'll have to retest again tomorrow (maybe it was > happening with a different card). Older ALSA with a newer kernel has never been supported. Why would you want to replace the ALSA in the kernel with an old version? Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/