Received: by 2002:a25:868d:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z13csp524071ybk; Wed, 13 May 2020 06:23:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIOXjptBMUXlPtEYl57YkWL9USf72exJDXoWF1SifLa+YR5aRFnJnlupOiJUzxsW7Lt4Dzw X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:8402:: with SMTP id n2mr14649485ejx.26.1589376210034; Wed, 13 May 2020 06:23:30 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1589376210; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KG0VHnyjpiGloYABMWtgzzcYLvYFFwwPKog3+90pdqcw7k3tXQyGEERahBUg1oD7kR Gc2BO4T/imRsrB8c/PiGvFOL6ZS5/+V0sM8sPclRTDeODaMI2HTOPGRVok2oZgQxqvQJ MqirH9/twQ3ozk0hU5ohvakQuez0OOlK5V8sFSQzHDGg+uXdLUP2n/mH/0xmoxiYzD51 sJEK36zhDJC18jYXbiDP9/nUrM/sp6JqxTopCFqtV2rSxS5WC82LdCQMV786uGrCLy5E 5q637Ca/5+hrMT5kYI3JpVWlyslsK1N48IXxWf96UDcBDUnz8EaIZJw4YzSFW2P2zjcq KcGw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=l18yHMdCqn3q7/L8jmhif7m91RcXaJz3iE/kIpr22VI=; b=sAqSkNBQ2Af5ZFa7PwfBRn/F2+/uiwf7IOhjYfJmerE2JSUr9fk/pF39Oczwcm4JoH uEToV4cTIjbYsfb34qVxwfw7QH1Az9AnVHi4GzUlaoRiUBQAnRi1A+5vEf2OkrrMSdCD MXa9MKvLeho07KUQ8BY7MGRtAxaYlkOI8P/q8NcXTfHFNU/wG6kbPg7px5+iY0HgaI8k BsfGIK5PO4TLwrS7pqBPBSzI+gPbN8Kt+I4+9uRukuwSere/W5wFeZcZjJHbXfc3wKCm RtKc5PpgqFP68omQn9oIHXvVDGQ/y9EfXACcB6UwiXiHw/oMI7OEmb7ygPjNVof6lu/W 3mrQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=o7LZddYK; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p90si9645440edd.215.2020.05.13.06.23.06; Wed, 13 May 2020 06:23:30 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=o7LZddYK; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387426AbgEMNSM (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 13 May 2020 09:18:12 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:40284 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726034AbgEMNSL (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2020 09:18:11 -0400 Received: from mail-vs1-f53.google.com (mail-vs1-f53.google.com [209.85.217.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 698B920890; Wed, 13 May 2020 13:18:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1589375890; bh=eFMjZY/v2Asht7I/UpE2htqibqHIccOjg5FwflDPi/I=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=o7LZddYK2z9I/7JCKaE67GyFQtLMmnaHdG9dov4EPopF7tYlY27GcP042SKLLw/A/ Zm9L+FAllu3DLg+ele733AkiVKYLF1BxhTGnr+G7jcvO2VTiPs9ys1LxFhkEo5DoHK nFrdgmx9OHOSu3ZE7jlgf9m+LqRtWaLKl5xt4JcQ= Received: by mail-vs1-f53.google.com with SMTP id u12so10050215vsq.0; Wed, 13 May 2020 06:18:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubMVtaQQn8Vidlzgu/nTkb5pD4hdOHnuEDFV3N0eBxmcJjI/OyC H6mqxtjcVM2sOcfGN6303p1CB14fkLSKgMXfXPA= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:4d:: with SMTP id k13mr19498367vsp.198.1589375889355; Wed, 13 May 2020 06:18:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200427180433.7029-1-vbabka@suse.cz> <20200427180433.7029-6-vbabka@suse.cz> <20200427183913.GH11244@42.do-not-panic.com> <028d1996-9f4c-20c6-fb2a-706baa919dde@suse.cz> <20200511183155.GT11244@42.do-not-panic.com> <20200513131532.GO11244@42.do-not-panic.com> In-Reply-To: <20200513131532.GO11244@42.do-not-panic.com> From: Luis Chamberlain Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 07:17:57 -0600 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] lib/test_sysctl: support testing of sysctl. boot parameter To: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Andrew Morton , Kees Cook , Iurii Zaikin , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linux API , linux-mm , Ivan Teterevkov , Michal Hocko , David Rientjes , Matthew Wilcox , "Eric W . Biederman" , "Guilherme G . Piccoli" , Alexey Dobriyan , Thomas Gleixner , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Christian Brauner , Masami Hiramatsu Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 7:15 AM Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 10:58:16AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > > On 5/11/20 8:31 PM, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 01:05:22PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > > >> ----8<---- > > >> From a999e993a89e521b152bbd4b1466f69e62879c30 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > >> From: Vlastimil Babka > > >> Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 12:59:49 +0200 > > >> Subject: [PATCH] lib/test_sysctl: support testing of sysctl. boot parameter - > > >> fix > > >> > > >> Skip the new test if boot_int sysctl is not present, otherwise, per Luis, > > >> "This would fail if someone uses this script to test an older kernel, and > > >> the scripts in selftests are supposed to work with older kernels." > > >> > > >> Suggested-by: Luis Chamberlain > > >> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka > > >> --- > > >> tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh | 5 +++++ > > >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > >> > > >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh > > >> index ef6417b8067b..148704f465b5 100755 > > >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh > > >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh > > >> @@ -756,6 +756,11 @@ sysctl_test_0006() > > > > > > You want to: > > > > > > > > > # Kselftest framework requirement - SKIP code is 4. > > > ksft_skip=4 > > > > > >> sysctl_test_0007() > > >> { > > >> TARGET="${SYSCTL}/boot_int" > > >> + if [ ! -f $TARGET ]; then > > >> + echo "Skipping test for $TARGET as it is not present ..." > > >> + return 0 > > >> + fi > > > > > > And return 4 instead. > > > > If I return it from the function, nobody will care, AFAICS. If I 'exit > > $ksft_skip', is that correct if it's just a single test out of 7? > > yes please do that. Ah but once we add test_0008() it may be supported.. so I think return would be OK