Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932241AbWCMSHN (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Mar 2006 13:07:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932240AbWCMSHM (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Mar 2006 13:07:12 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:56200 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932241AbWCMSGz (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Mar 2006 13:06:55 -0500 Subject: Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system? From: Arjan van de Ven To: gcoady@gmail.com Cc: j4K3xBl4sT3r , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: <436c596f0603121640h4f286d53h9f1dd177fd0475a4@mail.gmail.com> <1142237867.3023.8.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 19:06:52 +0100 Message-Id: <1142273212.3023.35.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 658 Lines: 18 On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 05:03 +1100, Grant Coady wrote: > On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 09:17:47 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > >2.6 is actively maintained and will be for quite some time :) > > 2.6 is an experimental, unstable and non-trustworthy file muncher. that's tripple fud that sounds like a troll ;) Sorry but it does. 2.6 is very stable for a LOT of people, more so than 2.4 in fact. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/