Received: by 2002:a25:868d:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z13csp810105ybk; Wed, 13 May 2020 13:47:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxn1PPb5ay8a0TCnZ1qpexE6SumEGIGopReorD76EFL1M9yMQdb4L3LOtVRqRqmd4lhE5LA X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4048:: with SMTP id y8mr837089ejj.258.1589402839985; Wed, 13 May 2020 13:47:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1589402839; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=y7l/Ii/8iO5qhEo/lXtyf0ODbcNCHc75rmj2hjh5k15yh/Q3kU+D31yzSk+6gAbQkA sT9SJvKzUiR4kbwtJmbWgFQ3jLFdy+LqlUQCwXzMnGJ1GBEwvDWQKJ8sJNceUh5hFMi8 cqKGWU0Okt6JDNuXyCNnHtc8xTsTKDPFrG22GeaPJoMI3ywuvg/EeAf+EHIgkbvXZ7MR gDQkTqcfgRIq5EoUICwy3xWOkHTT29iam/6gqIwYjNjqGzMgVYZFMr7gP1V1wP6407Zr QnRuXAv7DIscrTkPTCw7BwegBW+jrEKTjxHy7Dq7fRbA2xnqXrm8HDWeCBPlOPxUV4q2 Jpwg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:subject:mime-version:user-agent :message-id:in-reply-to:date:references:cc:to:from; bh=Nq10TC/JHViIzfhrX9qv5dh7bZJfWtiTO1dJ5bRfNh8=; b=MyL3RRwcJZLs/knoS/FOql9W42yrVY7X0ASSNTh69iLWe+jclc2Dv3g7aRQStTOdwg 6D+CGWQ6JJ790J+bmZzWUWTlgq14oVGBRb2drwgC9dge6P76QWDo4BjHWNP+PTrGYwZY qJpt9ZxpPsDd5bceiPeI7DftBCbnqtKLe0X7xhFx1w/zwSj46Z6Vkse/alNUklhhxAuX Vitk1/p4vfpE/OcWVroRcVTQJOxX9wFqa/WV6DgnJGBBpneDxT2B4CG9XGuRewsVrpMD a7pdPX0V7tvBflc2NCfXK8kVuRunioVAceaSl44o0EbOJY+totfftWAiVe5DLEYqDqN0 oC2g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s19si530587ejz.320.2020.05.13.13.46.57; Wed, 13 May 2020 13:47:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388686AbgEMNqK (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 13 May 2020 09:46:10 -0400 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:49832 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387751AbgEMNqI (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2020 09:46:08 -0400 Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYri1-0007Yh-74; Wed, 13 May 2020 07:46:05 -0600 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95] helo=x220.xmission.com) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1jYri0-0006Pz-3e; Wed, 13 May 2020 07:46:05 -0600 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Luis Chamberlain Cc: Xiaoming Ni , Al Viro , Kees Cook , Stephen Rothwell , Helge Deller , Parisc List , yzaikin@google.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Christoph Hellwig References: <20200511111123.68ccbaa3@canb.auug.org.au> <99095805-8cbe-d140-e2f1-0c5a3e84d7e7@huawei.com> <20200512003305.GX11244@42.do-not-panic.com> <87y2pxs73w.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20200512172413.GC11244@42.do-not-panic.com> <87k11hrqzc.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20200512220341.GE11244@42.do-not-panic.com> Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 08:42:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20200512220341.GE11244@42.do-not-panic.com> (Luis Chamberlain's message of "Tue, 12 May 2020 22:03:41 +0000") Message-ID: <87d078oss9.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1jYri0-0006Pz-3e;;;mid=<87d078oss9.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX18vmS02bGQubPKIl5qUYavG96RWvX+2dVI= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa06.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.5 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,XMSubLong,XMSubMetaSx_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5000] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa06 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 1.0 XMSubMetaSx_00 1+ Sexy Words X-Spam-DCC: ; sa06 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: *;Luis Chamberlain X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 682 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.04 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 11 (1.6%), b_tie_ro: 9 (1.4%), parse: 1.26 (0.2%), extract_message_metadata: 4.5 (0.7%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.90 (0.3%), tests_pri_-1000: 6 (0.8%), tests_pri_-950: 1.72 (0.3%), tests_pri_-900: 1.38 (0.2%), tests_pri_-90: 328 (48.1%), check_bayes: 326 (47.8%), b_tokenize: 11 (1.7%), b_tok_get_all: 8 (1.1%), b_comp_prob: 3.5 (0.5%), b_tok_touch_all: 300 (43.9%), b_finish: 1.03 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 298 (43.7%), check_dkim_signature: 0.90 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 2.7 (0.4%), poll_dns_idle: 0.60 (0.1%), tests_pri_10: 3.2 (0.5%), tests_pri_500: 16 (2.3%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the parisc-hd tree X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Luis Chamberlain writes: > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 12:40:55PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> Luis Chamberlain writes: >> >> > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 06:52:35AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> >> Luis Chamberlain writes: >> >> >> >> > +static struct ctl_table fs_base_table[] = { >> >> > + { >> >> > + .procname = "fs", >> >> > + .mode = 0555, >> >> > + .child = fs_table, >> >> > + }, >> >> > + { } >> >> > +}; >> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ You don't need this at all. >> >> > > +static int __init fs_procsys_init(void) >> >> > +{ >> >> > + struct ctl_table_header *hdr; >> >> > + >> >> > + hdr = register_sysctl_table(fs_base_table); >> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Please use register_sysctl instead. >> >> AKA >> >> hdr = register_sysctl("fs", fs_table); >> > >> > Ah, much cleaner thanks! >> >> It is my hope you we can get rid of register_sysctl_table one of these >> days. It was the original interface but today it is just a >> compatibility wrapper. >> >> I unfortunately ran out of steam last time before I finished converting >> everything over. > > Let's give it one more go. I'll start with the fs stuff. Just to be clear moving the tables out of kernel/sysctl.c is a related but slightly different problem. Today it looks like there are 35 calls of register_sysctl_table and 9 calls of register_sysctl_paths. Among them is lib/sysctl_test.c and check-sysctl-docs. Meanwhile I can only find 5 calls to register_sysctl in the tree so it looks like I didn't get very far converting things over. Eric