Received: by 2002:a25:868d:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z13csp811956ybk; Wed, 13 May 2020 13:50:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyGE1s3XVOXTH3csHNWKx04TXYkCuuySfFdg4v3QrjEcIuEcPC2Gt+bFAWfIxMQvVkE/4kO X-Received: by 2002:a50:e04c:: with SMTP id g12mr1412849edl.74.1589403032540; Wed, 13 May 2020 13:50:32 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1589403032; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=H7ahL9TDhMB9j+dCYWgTPipzujM3whqjcY/EcwXNHAfuJ6aKWKdxfDIz7a1saNJh9O G7utro2fWWlVAHmUQ09wudGQ42obWlXcmm46+E7RkUNNYhHzHVM/qCUmH9OndAEvRCV5 bOZ6UPF+aYHhnEN3bt+xxfdPtk/F+FaUBydqA+6HC91jbaJJWjdzykMk/PW1o5aeEfpw 0avTotr+vPeRWm23rBl9Ht7/TVQEEjoSNDN9fd2qNEWX8YOWF1XhPLx7sxGyQJRod3PP DUZcWnQhaXCO/Lmvng7nVifkEBmNOM4rEbCAnGRZP+08cpqqKxcStNtgBZyukb32pCa8 LydQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=MOtcRO8yehVSuZslIGL5nQgDMnj5Z9CVnTdic3uxMtQ=; b=AkTTPOW3xMrwp5GlbL3y7OMVeSIbMsGcjXZut0WHGjWqo9p0uU8FZ6HidNi9WoJJxW 6yRR/loZmykWbLhc8yYEyhv2mydEPy5pIKchkrXtHFI+6IgHGXxPW7HkuNQzGewk08bG Y+eN6Vy958VWcmUNNQuDlyJX3MNTKvpgdBaihKCTlbdGXijWCAmfpCb+yFdCF6jfZBMB +j+hVVaGBQKjPuvXnJ0OgaVEhfbsvDa2wWpCd0WvQHLy034VTp22KLengjaxK8tnkY+B Ff/xlm8Sr1gI6nW7IdPUWfC1pvOkTay+WflgazXog8iggAe5I3PPX3JJCb3fJdJZHTjf t+Qw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id qk11si525207ejb.436.2020.05.13.13.50.09; Wed, 13 May 2020 13:50:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389572AbgEMQZ1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 13 May 2020 12:25:27 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:42932 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730831AbgEMQZ0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2020 12:25:26 -0400 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6FB972064E; Wed, 13 May 2020 16:25:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 12:25:24 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Sven Schnelle Cc: LKML , lkp@lists.01.org Subject: Re: [tracing] 06e0a548ba: WARNING:at_kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c:#ring_buffer_iter_peek Message-ID: <20200513122524.2352c105@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20200513161557.GA73453@tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> References: <20200429090508.GG5770@shao2-debian> <20200513091906.GA12720@tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <20200513092922.6d79f6ee@gandalf.local.home> <20200513161557.GA73453@tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 13 May 2020 18:15:57 +0200 Sven Schnelle wrote: > Thanks for looking into this. I've attached my /proc/config.gz to this Mail. > The x86 system is my Laptop which is a Thinkpad X280 with 4 HT CPUs (so 8 cpus > in total). I've tried disabling preemption, but this didn't help. > > It's always this check that causes the loop: > > if (iter->head >= rb_page_size(iter->head_page)) { > rb_inc_iter(iter); > goto again; > } > > On the first loop iter->head is some value > 0 and rb_page_size returns > 0, afterwards it gets twice to this check with both values 0. The third > time the warning is triggered. Maybe that information helps. Letting it run long enough, I was able to trigger it. I think I know what's wrong with it. I'll put in some debugging to see if my thoughts are accurate. Thanks for bringing this back to my attention. -- Steve