Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 22:48:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 22:47:52 -0400 Received: from sanrel1.sdd.hp.com ([192.6.114.30]:57360 "HELO sanrel1.sdd.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 22 Oct 2001 22:47:38 -0400 Message-ID: <3BD4DA86.40405@pacbell.net> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 19:48:38 -0700 From: Patrick Chase User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.3) Gecko/20010816 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.2.20pre10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org /> > So, then, just to satisfy my curiosity, how long until users of Linux in/ /> > the U.S.A. will no longer be allowed to download new kernels?/ > Potentially about 12 months after the SSSCA is passed. At which point you may > well find only a binary only OS with enforced copy management is legal in > the USA. Not even then, unless you can convince each and every contributor to relicense their contribution to you under something other than the GPL. (My reading of the license is that there is _no_ legality-based exception to the pertinent "derivative works" clause, though I could easily be wrong). Your change summaries are your original work, so you are of course free to withold information there at your discretion ;-) -- Patrick - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/