Subject: RE: [future of drivers?] a proposal for binary drivers.
From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Tim Tassonis <timtas@cubic.ch>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <4415C15F.4020500@cubic.ch>
References: <4415C15F.4020500@cubic.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 14:15:10 -0500
Message-Id: <1142277311.13256.9.camel@mindpipe>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1183
Lines: 33

On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 20:00 +0100, Tim Tassonis wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 10:24 +0100, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> >> Maybe not under (US-American) copyright, but under continental
> >> European authors rights there are such possibilities (I leave it to
> >> lawyers if and when they apply) and you can't even remove them with
> >> contracts (as with all law stuff).
> >> 
> > 
> > Please refrain from knee-jerk USA-bashing, you said yourself you don't
> > know the law.
> > 
> > Lee
> > 
> 
> Are you completely out of your head or what? When somebody reminds you 
> of the fact that U.S. law is not the only law in the world and that some 
> things may be different in other countries you call him a knee-jerking 
> USA-basher???
> 

No I was referring to the implication that the GPL is not enforceable
under US copyright law.

> In this sense, you better go back wanking to pictures of tortured 
> iranians, yankee.

No comment

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/