Received: by 2002:a25:868d:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z13csp1128808ybk; Thu, 14 May 2020 00:52:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwYW9AX4Wo+aCohoqpCeHXc0n0vFJQiZwMDKocCifh5+sJilOmHih94LRRVVaeiQY3g2/CX X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1751:: with SMTP id d17mr2543849eje.314.1589442724639; Thu, 14 May 2020 00:52:04 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1589442724; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=LZp0RnQpZBgzRiiCWvzZ/HpzxaPhJ9WoERZu+PpP2ZjWjjg+1MDIHNg/wTyz4z8hO9 TPNf27U6TdlkrIUVECG3AEi+yomSGkykc63jS/mpvf4pjVqWjhLMlB2h+hQNOX9O7FCX MW1XZWV0yibBzc917UZov/ZB+9sm2VxwmJALyjoIfUeD8fCb6quAH7w8Fgo74hJkLUc2 L2YZ1ol4RmW2UZvshQlLC9MbGRfznoy2YxD/V6OQwoNxustrCXPkPYp97jVaDHtdnScV /R4kTQDtOXrNZLiN7bZJo/fsrGJDSR3MVM/Jc04FT+wd9IKFxs0WON2JJIrq52n7U0wR jK1g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=GFdv49jE8NB09da5XlYRGuc/D/fBtE2t1zx6PIeznCc=; b=C2jmJh9W6JyYfBxBKgHos4FFr5kXPdAtGCfJGuBMNTVbJqMb1R4jYFW6JpFVnwjuIx 0dXv/cU+vvV06p9TM/LyiJjzBFmy9w/Y2gyt02nF5+mtL3yJsJGwgNISekV6IEhdMUOq yX9jGM4aE+TebmnQohWsNjwcVQ6UigeJwvuEd0YtrRQi5n+Nba1y1NdCBw0rZfHCWbQi QgPebLn9S6oUA/Ic9apIP3KWoUNgl5Mewu9Mi8YzA+jvTdzHUxtfs1TC0dbFatsl9MKb Qi5D5zJcI2Tk9H2g2cuttg+/hNhKyafyK+al1faLbYvF6WTqN+Px9su5ObWTkFLi6mio +Npw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id qo19si1274519ejb.239.2020.05.14.00.51.41; Thu, 14 May 2020 00:52:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725970AbgENHuF (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 14 May 2020 03:50:05 -0400 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:57511 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725886AbgENHuE (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 May 2020 03:50:04 -0400 Received: from ip5f5af183.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([95.90.241.131] helo=wittgenstein) by youngberry.canonical.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jZ8d0-0004a4-O6; Thu, 14 May 2020 07:50:02 +0000 Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 09:50:01 +0200 From: Christian Brauner To: "Luck, Tony" Cc: "Yu, Fenghua" , "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , Al Viro , Arnd Bergmann , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , Qais Yousef , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] ia64: enable HAVE_COPY_THREAD_TLS, switch to kernel_clone_args Message-ID: <20200514075001.c63f3isbialsacpd@wittgenstein> References: <20200513204848.1208864-1-christian.brauner@ubuntu.com> <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F7F6266E0@ORSMSX115.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F7F6266E0@ORSMSX115.amr.corp.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 09:19:41PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote: > > I tried my very best to test this patch including installing Debian 3 > > and 4 to try and get my hands on a gcc version that would allow > > cross-compiling for ia64. But no, even that wasn't possible let alone a > > working qemu for ia64. So this is largely untested but hopefully a > > straightforward change. If this breaks something we will hear from > > people if they still care about new kernels on ia64 since they won't be > > able to get any further than trying to start init. :) If this patch > > breaks it, I'll fix it. > > My last functional ia64 machine no longer powers on. Unclear if it's just > a broken power supply or something more serious. With almost nobody > in offices/labs anymore my search for another machine is proceeding > slowly. Ah. :/ > > Which is to say ... it won't be me noticing any breakage (at least not for > a while). If we can't get it tested on a machine soon, would you still be ok proceeding with this patch? > > I think Al Viro bought an ia64 on ebay a while back ... if that's still running > perhaps he'll test? I have to admit, that out of pure desperation I considered buying on too on ebay. But they are still suprisingly pricy. Christian