Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAE4VaGCf0P2ht+7nbGFHV8Dd=e4oDEUPNdRUUBokRWgKRxofAA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200507155422.GD3758@techsingularity.net> <CAE4VaGCDTeE16nNmSS8fGzCBvHsO=qkJAW6yDiORAxgsPi-Ziw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200508092212.GE3758@techsingularity.net> <CAE4VaGC_v6On-YvqdTwAWu3Mq4ofiV0pLov-QpV+QHr_SJr+Rw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE4VaGDQWPePtmtCZP=ROYW1KPxtPhGDrxqy2QbirHGJdwk4=w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200513153023.GF3758@techsingularity.net> <CAE4VaGBq5+ucS4p+0AzFsNP7YDsg7dLZ73dzuhBerHiM4EYP_Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200514095055.GG3758@techsingularity.net> <CAE4VaGCGUFOAZ+YHDnmeJ95o4W0j04Yb7EWnf8a43caUQs_WuQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200514100814.GH3758@techsingularity.net>
In-Reply-To: <20200514100814.GH3758@techsingularity.net>
From:   Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 May 2020 12:22:05 +0200
Message-ID: <CAE4VaGBwFvduqOyn8pQnN3U4ozuB=4DVx6i1vheAg-2PegvE9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] Reconcile NUMA balancing decisions with the load
 balancer v6
To:     Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc:     Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
        Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Douglas Shakshober <dshaks@redhat.com>,
        Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
        Joe Mario <jmario@redhat.com>, Bill Gray <bgray@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Thanks!

Do you have a link? I cannot find it on github
(https://github.com/gormanm/mmtests, searched for
config-network-netperf-cstate-small-cross-socket)


On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 12:08 PM Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 11:58:36AM +0200, Jirka Hladky wrote:
> > Thank you, Mel!
> >
> > We are using netperf as well, but AFAIK it's running on two different
> > hosts. I will check with colleagues, if they can
> > add network-netperf-unbound run on the localhost.
> >
> > Is this the right config?
> > https://github.com/gormanm/mmtests/blob/345f82bee77cbf09ba57f470a1cfc1ae413c97df/bin/generate-generic-configs
> > sed -e 's/NETPERF_BUFFER_SIZES=.*/NETPERF_BUFFER_SIZES=64/'
> > config-network-netperf-unbound > config-network-netperf-unbound-small
> >
>
> That's one I was using at the moment to have a quick test after
> the reconciliation series was completed. It has since changed to
> config-network-netperf-cstate-small-cross-socket to limit cstates, bind
> the client and server to two local CPUs and using one buffer size. It
> was necessary to get an ftrace function graph of the wakeup path that
> was readable and not too noisy due to migrations, cpuidle exit costs etc.
>
> --
> Mel Gorman
> SUSE Labs
>


-- 
-Jirka