Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964815AbWCMWZu (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Mar 2006 17:25:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964813AbWCMWZu (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Mar 2006 17:25:50 -0500 Received: from viper.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.4]:33239 "HELO viper.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S964815AbWCMWZt (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Mar 2006 17:25:49 -0500 Subject: Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system? From: Lee Revell To: j4K3xBl4sT3r Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <436c596f0603131401l479dd4b5q164017f701b37289@mail.gmail.com> References: <436c596f0603121640h4f286d53h9f1dd177fd0475a4@mail.gmail.com> <1142237867.3023.8.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20060313182725.GA31211@mars.ravnborg.org> <200603140000.45052.pantelis@embeddedalley.com> <436c596f0603131401l479dd4b5q164017f701b37289@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 17:25:44 -0500 Message-Id: <1142288745.13256.57.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.5.92 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 507 Lines: 13 On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 19:01 -0300, j4K3xBl4sT3r wrote: > so, in the case of the big footprints, might I use a 2.4.x instead of > 2.6.x just to avoid memory leaks and performance loss? Simply using more memory than a previous version is not a memory leak. Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/