Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200515105537.4876-3-vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>
 <202005152142.AWvx4xc5%lkp@intel.com> <CAHp75Ven9q-6dDYtP_uXigeS_r2uvpUZVR5Mh0RdEd36MbTG+Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75Ven9q-6dDYtP_uXigeS_r2uvpUZVR5Mh0RdEd36MbTG+Q@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 May 2020 17:27:19 +0300
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdUWaEAuStEQZD4yOWcxBT0EkxiX90u1_9vppFb5JniGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] mtd: rawnand: Add NAND controller support on Intel
 LGM SoC
To:     kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc:     "Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX" 
        <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@linux.intel.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:MEMORY TECHNOLOGY..." <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
        Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>,
        Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>,
        masonccyang@mxic.com.tw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 5:25 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:48 PM kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:

> >    440                  reg = cpu_to_be32(*pdata++);
> >  > 441                  writel(reg, ebu_host->hsnand + HSNAND_CMSG_0);
> >    442
> >    443                  reg = cpu_to_be32(*pdata);
> >    444                  writel(reg, ebu_host->hsnand + HSNAND_CMSG_1);
>
> On BE:
> cpu_to_be32 -> no-op
> writel() -> converts reg to LE
>
> On LE:
> cpu_to_be32 -> converts to BE
> writel() -> no-op (in terms of conversion)
>
> Seems to me that the proper API (if above is intended) should be swab32().
> But something tells me that above is broken (or my understanding is wrong).

And perhaps it should use lo_hi_writeq() or something like that.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko