Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 3/4] Documentation/litmus-tests: Merge atomic's
 README into top-level one
To:     paulmck@kernel.org
Cc:     Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Vineeth Remanan Pillai <vpillai@digitalocean.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
        Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
        Jade Alglave <j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk>,
        Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@inria.fr>,
        Daniel Lustig <dlustig@nvidia.com>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
        Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
References: <7809dbfa-7a76-8663-799a-908c4ead8d30@gmail.com>
 <21e1ba24-22d0-8083-770c-53d320ba5420@gmail.com>
 <fd7e7c6f-fda1-7f2b-19f3-a09b73b10de8@gmail.com>
 <CAEXW_YSjo2hgvg-FN_MR7FVEcp-7gH17jb0-262k+ydSuuDjuQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200512163022.GI2869@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
 <09a8f418-0a46-87ea-dbdb-a43efc66476c@gmail.com>
 <6d162e69-5d2f-1fbf-1588-ab19c30e7311@gmail.com>
 <20200514004618.GA94665@debian-boqun.qqnc3lrjykvubdpftowmye0fmh.lx.internal.cloudapp.net>
 <20200514171656.GR2869@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
 <0ded5099-fe59-914a-d0dd-999cc334ff0a@gmail.com>
 <20200514224558.GZ2869@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
From:   Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ed5b16b9-b522-8f9b-847b-e18d6387017e@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 16 May 2020 00:01:41 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200514224558.GZ2869@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 14 May 2020 15:45:58 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 07:03:33AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
>> On Thu, 14 May 2020 10:16:56 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 08:46:18AM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
>>>> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 06:39:03AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
>>>>> From 96fa6680e3b990633ecbb6d11acf03a161b790bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>>>> From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
>>>>> Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 15:12:57 +0900
>>>>> Subject: [PATCH RESEND 3/4] Documentation/litmus-tests: Merge atomic's README into top-level one
>>>>>
>>>>> Where Documentation/litmus-tests/README lists RCU litmus tests,
>>>>> Documentation/litmus-tests/atomic/README lists atomic litmus tests.
>>>>> For symmetry, merge the latter into former, with some context
>>>>> adjustment in the introduction.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
>>>>> Acked-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
>>>>> Acked-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Applied, and thank you all!
>>>
>>> I rebased, cancelling the revert with the original, resulting in an
>>> updated lkmm branch on -rcu.  There was one minor conflict, so could
>>> one of you please check to make sure that I resolved things appropriately?
>>
>> One thing I noticed.
>>
>> Commit b2998782ded4 ("Documentation/litmus-tests: Clarify about the RCU
>> pre-initialization test")'s change log says:
>>
>>     Since this test returned to tools/memory-model/, make sure that it is
>>                     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>     at least referenced from Documentation/litmus-tests/'s README.
>>
>> Because of the rebase, this needs amendment as well as the title.
>>
>> Something like
>>
>>     Documentation/litumus-tests: Cite a relevant litmus test in tools/memory-model
>>
>>     For ease of finding the RCU related litmus test under
>>     tools/memory-model/, add an entry in README.
>>
>> ?
> 
> Good catch, and yes, I will update that on the next rebase.
> 
> Any other things in need of adjustment?

Aside from the missing Signed-off-by tags Stephen pointed out, I don't
see anything.

        Thanks, Akira

> 
> 							Thanx, Paul