Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751767AbWCNGuk (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Mar 2006 01:50:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751871AbWCNGuk (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Mar 2006 01:50:40 -0500 Received: from e6.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.146]:34177 "EHLO e6.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751767AbWCNGuj (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Mar 2006 01:50:39 -0500 Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 12:20:22 +0530 From: Balbir Singh To: Shailabh Nagar Cc: Lee Revell , linux-kernel , Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: [Patch 1/9] timestamp diff Message-ID: <20060314065022.GA5748@in.ibm.com> Reply-To: balbir@in.ibm.com References: <1142296834.5858.3.camel@elinux04.optonline.net> <1142296939.5858.6.camel@elinux04.optonline.net> <1142298072.13256.70.camel@mindpipe> <1142298325.5858.40.camel@elinux04.optonline.net> <1142298764.13256.73.camel@mindpipe> <661de9470603131942k768d672eq6009769ec58a4329@mail.gmail.com> <441645FB.6000002@watson.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <441645FB.6000002@watson.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 524 Lines: 13 > Lee's point is valid....we should be doing the set_normalized_timespec. > Semantically that sounds correct. But the intension of the caller as in our case could be to convert the timespec to nsec_t. Calling set_normalized_timespec() might be an overhead in this case. Balbir - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/