Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 09:24:17 +0100
From: Andreas Mohr <andi@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: ck@vds.kolivas.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
       Jun OKAJIMA <okajima@digitalinfra.co.jp>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: does swsusp suck after resume for you? [was Re: Faster resuming of suspend technology.]
Message-ID: <20060314082417.GA7476@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de>
References: <200603101704.AA00798@bbb-jz5c7z9hn9y.digitalinfra.co.jp> <20060313113631.GA1736@elf.ucw.cz> <200603132303.18758.kernel@kolivas.org> <200603141613.10915.kernel@kolivas.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200603141613.10915.kernel@kolivas.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 909
Lines: 20

Hi,

On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 04:13:10PM +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> Since my warning probably scared anyone from actually trying this patch I've 
> given it a thorough working over on my own laptop, booting with mem=128M. The 
> patch works fine and basically with the patch after resuming from disk I have 
> 25MB more memory in use with pages prefetched from swap. This makes a 
> noticeable difference to me. That's a pretty artificial workload, so if 
> someone who actually has lousy wakeup after resume could test the patch it 
> would be appreciated.

I did try it, but ran into weird unrelated compile failures multiple times
(sorry, no log).

Andreas Mohr
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/