Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 15 May 2020 20:36:01 +0200
From:   Stephen Kitt <steve@sk2.org>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: sysctl/kernel: document unaligned controls
Message-ID: <20200515203601.401a46a9@heffalump.sk2.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200515112735.67ee1148@lwn.net>
References: <20200515160406.8649-1-steve@sk2.org>
        <20200515112735.67ee1148@lwn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
 boundary="Sig_/NfKkTxFuCefmYlDAsI+Q.k4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

--Sig_/NfKkTxFuCefmYlDAsI+Q.k4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 15 May 2020 11:27:35 -0600, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 15 May 2020 18:04:06 +0200
> Stephen Kitt <steve@sk2.org> wrote:
>=20
> > diff --git a/Documentation/index.rst b/Documentation/index.rst
> > index 9599c0f3eea8..17c38d899572 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/index.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/index.rst
> > @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ Architecture-agnostic documentation
> >     :maxdepth: 2
> > =20
> >     asm-annotations
> > +   unaligned-memory-access
> > =20
> >  Architecture-specific documentation
> >  -----------------------------------
> > diff --git a/Documentation/unaligned-memory-access.txt
> > b/Documentation/unaligned-memory-access.rst similarity index 100%
> > rename from Documentation/unaligned-memory-access.txt
> > rename to Documentation/unaligned-memory-access.rst =20
>=20
> Adding this to the toctree is great, but I'd just as soon not leave it in
> the top-level directory while we do that.  Since you're renaming it
> anyway, can you move it into process/?  It's not a perfect fit, but that's
> where that type of material has been going so far.

I can indeed. Should it still be listed in the main toctree, or in the
process toctree?

Regards,

Stephen

--Sig_/NfKkTxFuCefmYlDAsI+Q.k4
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=GqR/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/NfKkTxFuCefmYlDAsI+Q.k4--