Received: by 2002:a25:868d:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z13csp982320ybk; Fri, 15 May 2020 20:07:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxse9rXfHWFn3f/ynKt5fXvGBVS94hH3/WQUtxxH8HnZ1T2DqfQlLJXGQxuFnXe2S2QNE6/ X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:729c:: with SMTP id b28mr5903783ejl.29.1589598466216; Fri, 15 May 2020 20:07:46 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1589598466; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NEmXhjNQVkiACWR/J6Sr8fh2E0ltnn1AqNH6bsrwYVVxkm331X9r3b8CbBZPv1dU2D eeLKwnKzKVbfVavCDJt+upDrpbWtgzxZCYA9G8/fPQY5+C4T0KE35fvyZdeIZY/j2W9q /lGjRa10uMX+S4QaCGAPWKG/159Myuxm/K3DlBzcAdqVxHWt7y5So9qtmuQlLAw4Abj3 +yYHlINybJksbmZOVbx6VVms1QLbMpgTYjKLmFz9ifdBLmdUvv/Zp9+7V80zf08UyGwV QE/eEVa70sAF3Dfa2N0mNoy4c19JP+d5DUTS1vTCJlMbu3o5SGR5N7ezo8Cr21H5ygQ0 2NuA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references:cc:to :subject; bh=Ew5ie+ylE50sdLykLEUrygomOkpW2D2UqhinOBJCv+o=; b=eGgdUjDNjecXW9R3AxqN1iEPFbkAVgpgR9bDpf5IVHw349tlUrp+NH09dPEWZaVYsd 1A08z4FibKOwtFzv2jwlimD+8dscZYdK7Wwb0mx1mjOsbt+i9pIIV84cGdMNBlI+MdGN 6oUg/TYHuj5gumovOBu71j5cfdIsegEUr4QInHef9DBmlt6slShfgZU8ls0Rl4I6zCdZ Br+sbhHIYLnhgiS2NuvJfv5vp7OTl3RMDKxCgfXpb8iE6JUHIBxY+Rk+rXLS9oomuy7u yLVSNj/7GBFxZJoDU4E6i6V0wvx4N5VlqWT4PnYCR9vnU/wy0xlvyE1iUIx21yxnSbrt jCqQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dr10si3208876ejc.190.2020.05.15.20.07.22; Fri, 15 May 2020 20:07:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727768AbgEPDGG (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 15 May 2020 23:06:06 -0400 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:4796 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726247AbgEPDGG (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 May 2020 23:06:06 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS412-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 6C817AA0CD6132F8330D; Sat, 16 May 2020 11:06:04 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.67.102.197) by DGGEMS412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.212) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Sat, 16 May 2020 11:05:54 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] proc/sysctl: add shared variables -1 To: Kees Cook CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , References: <1589517224-123928-1-git-send-email-nixiaoming@huawei.com> <1589517224-123928-3-git-send-email-nixiaoming@huawei.com> <202005150105.33CAEEA6C5@keescook> <88f3078b-9419-b9c6-e789-7d6e50ca2cef@huawei.com> <202005150904.743BB3E52@keescook> <202005151946.C6335E92@keescook> From: Xiaoming Ni Message-ID: <2656ae51-5348-0b37-d76d-1460b8eb3f10@huawei.com> Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 11:05:53 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <202005151946.C6335E92@keescook> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gbk"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.67.102.197] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2020/5/16 10:47, Kees Cook wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 10:32:19AM +0800, Xiaoming Ni wrote: >> On 2020/5/16 0:05, Kees Cook wrote: >>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 05:06:28PM +0800, Xiaoming Ni wrote: >>>> On 2020/5/15 16:06, Kees Cook wrote: >>>>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:33:42PM +0800, Xiaoming Ni wrote: >>>>>> Add the shared variable SYSCTL_NEG_ONE to replace the variable neg_one >>>>>> used in both sysctl_writes_strict and hung_task_warnings. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Xiaoming Ni >>>>>> --- >>>>>> fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c | 2 +- >>>>>> include/linux/sysctl.h | 1 + >>>>>> kernel/hung_task_sysctl.c | 3 +-- >>>>>> kernel/sysctl.c | 3 +-- >>>>> >>>>> How about doing this refactoring in advance of the extraction patch? >>>> Before advance of the extraction patch, neg_one is only used in one file, >>>> does it seem to have no value for refactoring? >>> >>> I guess it doesn't matter much, but I think it's easier to review in the >>> sense that neg_one is first extracted and then later everything else is >>> moved. >>> >> Later, when more features sysctl interface is moved to the code file, there >> will be more variables that need to be extracted. >> So should I only extract the neg_one variable here, or should I extract all >> the variables used by multiple features? > > Hmm -- if you're going to do a consolidation pass, then nevermind, I > don't think order will matter then. > > Thank you for the cleanup! Sorry we're giving you back-and-forth advice! > > -Kees > Sorry, I don't fully understand. Does this mean that there is no need to adjust the patch order or the order of variables in sysctl_vals? Should I extract only SYSCTL_NEG_ONE or should I extract all variables? Thanks Xiaoming Ni