Received: by 2002:a25:868d:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z13csp2503909ybk; Mon, 18 May 2020 00:18:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyXeDKNFOhbGzRqGXx5dYT35RG41d0SA7cal4FIlHo4xkUK7eAcFK3QVQNUDPVoCcZfspJg X-Received: by 2002:a50:b586:: with SMTP id a6mr12026471ede.292.1589786314505; Mon, 18 May 2020 00:18:34 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1589786314; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Qwtj+x1x3imB8NX/+WEIRulB9KHTZksw5GtpTnl79jETraG+FlsFfr4JD0K4wkddE/ a7szq/b1ERhPY3RSIvZqjWVRF/XBuVRKgpuhbywRS1X7L162+dXgORW/Aq5s5daRhaQY oK6DsyAhpXZ92W4RiA2Dp2gIwivdEOxH1IoXOLBbRMuBPFXhOhFl00BCAMZ3fo5ULXb5 /ImKzBrzPWvvi7PPOj3cXu8AooJE0CAL2Pdok9CiXDbvAZD3GLMIrnYayqZlm0qe++B6 g6YY3Xu4wgmD3HMilRy9cmKFryFNz57VODPBsNM2ElHwLcPSY10ZujsdujEQZvm/qgpy 1vTA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=ge+1tlW/aTz/TTXLwCvGVfgdJ0G8/C9kJ23AY1MVNHo=; b=l68uCbpZbcokeGtrtN9bgVXAToz5kg1uApr9EoRAUA0yMfcI7amLRQMQskHAWsuQ90 hcqSNn9TKeXDifwutylRIOtZqPbm7k/+WbEtcZtj1tFwmsQQG5Y/hHzhQswMCVAGbF6h XB1caN0s2ob8f40mdY307By9kC3YQfwYKyQApQeWaZDK4WzRLVyKajXp9lBH20t2gy7s z2DWX6NzKhhGmQsXF5fWtDj302+fwhvfTnTOh7OZFIdJLpJTmpDDmJRr8+yflNyjqZJe mFaOXR6h3jQKOLAbjSy0CWH+KibuEuVv6Kl2GakCgJV5jiANITcIJbjwSDcg/p9xipGu Zb9A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o23si6012399ejd.302.2020.05.18.00.18.11; Mon, 18 May 2020 00:18:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727097AbgERHQv (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 18 May 2020 03:16:51 -0400 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:4811 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726127AbgERHQq (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2020 03:16:46 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS413-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id F1C85E32A26F90F43E43; Mon, 18 May 2020 15:16:43 +0800 (CST) Received: from linux-ibm.site (10.175.102.37) by DGGEMS413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.213) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Mon, 18 May 2020 15:16:35 +0800 From: Xiongfeng Wang To: , , , CC: , , , , , , Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] CPPC: add support for SW BOOST Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 15:10:08 +0800 Message-ID: <1589785808-12138-4-git-send-email-wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.12.4 In-Reply-To: <1589785808-12138-1-git-send-email-wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> References: <1589785808-12138-1-git-send-email-wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.175.102.37] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To add SW BOOST support for CPPC, we need to get the max frequency of boost mode and non-boost mode. ACPI spec 6.2 section 8.4.7.1 describe the following two CPC registers. "Highest performance is the absolute maximum performance an individual processor may reach, assuming ideal conditions. This performance level may not be sustainable for long durations, and may only be achievable if other platform components are in a specific state; for example, it may require other processors be in an idle state. Nominal Performance is the maximum sustained performance level of the processor, assuming ideal operating conditions. In absence of an external constraint (power, thermal, etc.) this is the performance level the platform is expected to be able to maintain continuously. All processors are expected to be able to sustain their nominal performance state simultaneously." To add SW BOOST support for CPPC, we can use Highest Performance as the max performance in boost mode and Nominal Performance as the max performance in non-boost mode. If the Highest Performance is greater than the Nominal Performance, we assume SW BOOST is supported. The current CPPC driver does not support SW BOOST and use 'Highest Performance' as the max performance the CPU can achieve. 'Nominal Performance' is used to convert 'performance' to 'frequency'. That means, if firmware enable boost and provide a value for Highest Performance which is greater than Nominal Performance, boost feature is enabled by default. Because SW BOOST is disabled by default, so, after this patch, boost feature is disabled by default even if boost is enabled by firmware. Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang --- drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c index bda0b24..79fe6ac 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ * requested etc. */ static struct cppc_cpudata **all_cpu_data; +static bool boost_supported; struct cppc_workaround_oem_info { char oem_id[ACPI_OEM_ID_SIZE + 1]; @@ -310,7 +311,7 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) * Section 8.4.7.1.1.5 of ACPI 6.1 spec) */ policy->min = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu, cpu->perf_caps.lowest_nonlinear_perf); - policy->max = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu, cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf); + policy->max = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu, cpu->perf_caps.nominal_perf); /* * Set cpuinfo.min_freq to Lowest to make the full range of performance @@ -318,7 +319,7 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) * nonlinear perf */ policy->cpuinfo.min_freq = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu, cpu->perf_caps.lowest_perf); - policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu, cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf); + policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu, cpu->perf_caps.nominal_perf); policy->transition_delay_us = cppc_cpufreq_get_transition_delay_us(cpu_num); policy->shared_type = cpu->shared_type; @@ -343,6 +344,13 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) cpu->cur_policy = policy; + /* + * If 'highest_perf' is greater than 'nominal_perf', we assume CPU Boost + * is supported. + */ + if (cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf > cpu->perf_caps.nominal_perf) + boost_supported = true; + /* Set policy->cur to max now. The governors will adjust later. */ policy->cur = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpu, cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf); @@ -410,6 +418,35 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpunum) return cppc_get_rate_from_fbctrs(cpu, fb_ctrs_t0, fb_ctrs_t1); } +static int cppc_cpufreq_set_boost(int state) +{ + struct cpufreq_policy *policy; + struct cppc_cpudata *cpudata; + int ret = 0; + + if (!boost_supported) { + pr_err("BOOST not supported by CPU or firmware\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + + for_each_active_policy(policy) { + cpudata = all_cpu_data[policy->cpu]; + if (state) + policy->max = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpudata, + cpudata->perf_caps.highest_perf); + else + policy->max = cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpudata, + cpudata->perf_caps.nominal_perf); + policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = policy->max; + + ret = freq_qos_update_request(policy->max_freq_req, policy->max); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + } + + return ret; +} + static struct cpufreq_driver cppc_cpufreq_driver = { .flags = CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS, .verify = cppc_verify_policy, @@ -417,6 +454,7 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpunum) .get = cppc_cpufreq_get_rate, .init = cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init, .stop_cpu = cppc_cpufreq_stop_cpu, + .set_boost = cppc_cpufreq_set_boost, .name = "cppc_cpufreq", }; -- 1.7.12.4