Received: by 2002:a25:868d:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z13csp2626373ybk; Mon, 18 May 2020 04:04:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwnyd5fpoWUXYWofSKx+SRkvhkS3mTN5ERMpaRIB1uFd/ASF8WJ8Tvx60NZkbtxs4hrLdzd X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:9709:: with SMTP id k9mr1980378ejx.48.1589799850821; Mon, 18 May 2020 04:04:10 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1589799850; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=F5Hlm9pTX9pOhUvNU++odHzgACLkeigOXC+JBJZjaRsusczyqurkyZsINkQYv7sEtC AXvp4OtDMAbJlJqvNYMKD16hrU9MsKWUZYs1JUGC9IL3acjmHYEzmqG/mwtFzHVBOPbx q4e13KSSS+85R77KDGeb4Y4QALY12QYxbBrtGS/l1vFVvu2aml24wMAaY8ugfSQ7LXkc Y7yNlaTSBCXP//bvjTpeIuVP/YmIwnvCMwjmXwW0ibv/keS3ergFIb72l56aekqGyQYv jMyg5TvqwzkcF3yX+d0o/2zRfC9XqJGWR0T0Hn4C+UMw08oIaPz1EPYdVqeh+7K12RUZ 0PmQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=nE2sIldQvY7ujwiEAVOAY3usqusEhBpRXelwcocXdhw=; b=XtJizqtUwy1nn4Qz/vNN888eLRZeOpjQNG8FXtyDOB2qQz6X0sFz+6lKieElLYzi5T gB6sppuoBcj4iQ9qkvC8pXdKgwL5e007Eo3et61ECc+OwmFIyi3jJYcRFexDnjw4MCU4 fF6RB3YkSZ0rAuMAUIpQCKxox7fzA9eCtXmGqyfuEwj+j/WyEyejdJgXAKp8ZePAL2sM uyxYAkxTYbCniPF1sQoCP9mcvDWjNF+F5OH26fp1B8xLmO2E9p/B22CnW8s3HyoL1XOR jl2K0pifqhVD1kQcmX2IDjcMXuSsWVMLACLadXW5DaXKL/oa+oCiTun4nnPgoXSYYatQ Kg7w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dm8si7864213ejc.453.2020.05.18.04.03.45; Mon, 18 May 2020 04:04:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726726AbgERLBg (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 18 May 2020 07:01:36 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:44308 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726279AbgERLBg (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2020 07:01:36 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9328ABBD; Mon, 18 May 2020 11:01:36 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v5.5 09/10] mmap locking API: add mmap_assert_locked() and mmap_assert_write_locked() To: Michel Lespinasse , Matthew Wilcox Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-mm , LKML , Peter Zijlstra , Laurent Dufour , Liam Howlett , Jerome Glisse , Davidlohr Bueso , David Rientjes , Hugh Dickins , Ying Han , Jason Gunthorpe , Daniel Jordan References: <20200422001422.232330-1-walken@google.com> <20200422001422.232330-11-walken@google.com> <20200422015829.GR5820@bombadil.infradead.org> <20200423015917.GA13910@bombadil.infradead.org> <20200424012612.GA158937@google.com> <20200424013858.GB158937@google.com> From: Vlastimil Babka Message-ID: Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 13:01:33 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200424013858.GB158937@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/24/20 3:38 AM, Michel Lespinasse wrote: > Add new APIs to assert that mmap_sem is held. > > Using this instead of rwsem_is_locked and lockdep_assert_held[_write] > makes the assertions more tolerant of future changes to the lock type. > > Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse > --- > arch/x86/events/core.c | 2 +- > fs/userfaultfd.c | 6 +++--- > include/linux/mmap_lock.h | 14 ++++++++++++++ > mm/gup.c | 2 +- > mm/hmm.c | 2 +- > mm/memory.c | 2 +- > mm/mmu_notifier.c | 6 +++--- > mm/pagewalk.c | 6 +++--- > mm/util.c | 2 +- > 9 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > ... > @@ -73,4 +75,16 @@ static inline void mmap_read_unlock_non_owner(struct mm_struct *mm) > up_read_non_owner(&mm->mmap_sem); > } > > +static inline void mmap_assert_locked(struct mm_struct *mm) > +{ > + VM_BUG_ON_MM(!lockdep_is_held_type(&mm->mmap_sem, -1), mm); > + VM_BUG_ON_MM(!rwsem_is_locked(&mm->mmap_sem), mm); > +} > + > +static inline void mmap_assert_write_locked(struct mm_struct *mm) > +{ > + VM_BUG_ON_MM(!lockdep_is_held_type(&mm->mmap_sem, 0), mm); > + VM_BUG_ON_MM(!rwsem_is_locked(&mm->mmap_sem), mm); > +} I would remove VM_BUG_ON_MM() from the lockdep part. If kernel has lockdep enabled, it's already in heavy debugging mode enough so let's just use it and not depend on DEBUG_VM. Many sites you convert don't require DEBUG_VM for the lockdep checks. With that you can also use the standard lockdep_assert_held() and lockdep_assert_held_write() wrappers. If user has both lockdep and DEBUG_VM enabled, should we run both variants? Perhaps lockdep is enough as it's more comprehensive? Your initial v5 version was doing that.