Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 18 May 2020 13:51:00 +0200
From:   Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
        Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Amritha Nambiar <amritha.nambiar@intel.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
        Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
        Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
        "Tobin C . Harding" <tobin@kernel.org>,
        Vineet Gupta <vineet.gupta1@synopsys.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] lib: fix bitmap_parse() on 64-bit big endian archs
Message-ID: <20200518115059.GA19150@oc3871087118.ibm.com>
References: <1589798090-11136-1-git-send-email-agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
 <CAHp75VdM2yrpd2d3pK2RkmbhF3yiM4=fiTXL4i3yu3AxV3wY-A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VdM2yrpd2d3pK2RkmbhF3yiM4=fiTXL4i3yu3AxV3wY-A@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 02:33:43PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 1:40 PM Alexander Gordeev
> <agordeev@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Commit 2d6261583be0 ("lib: rework bitmap_parse()") does
> > not take into account order of halfwords on 64-bit big
> > endian architectures.
> 
> Thanks for report and the patch!
> 
> Did it work before? Can we have a test case for that that we will see
> the failure?

The test exists and enabled with CONFIG_TEST_BITMAP.
It does not appear ever passed before on 64 BE.
It does not fail on 64 LE for me either.

Thanks!

[...]

> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko