Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751901AbWCNVtb (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:49:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751929AbWCNVtb (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:49:31 -0500 Received: from fmr17.intel.com ([134.134.136.16]:64134 "EHLO orsfmr002.jf.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751901AbWCNVta convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:49:30 -0500 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Subject: RE: Exports for hrtimer APIs Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 13:48:11 -0800 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Exports for hrtimer APIs Thread-Index: AcZHru1gKbdbbJ+OQYSLJbEVSnIb/QAAMNTg From: "Stone, Joshua I" To: "Adrian Bunk" Cc: "Christoph Hellwig" , "LKML" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Mar 2006 21:48:10.0376 (UTC) FILETIME=[FC902880:01C647B0] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 865 Lines: 24 Adrian Bunk wrote: > The question is if the exports you want to add to the kernel are > acceptable or not. > > If the answer would be "no", trying to threaten with this kind of > cheap tricks is silly since the answer to your exported wrappers > would be the same as for the direct exports. Sorry, I didn't mean to sound threatening... My response was meant to address Christoph's implication that we shouldn't be keeping SystemTap out of the kernel tree. Due to the nature of SystemTap, I don't see any way around this. If it is decided that hrtimers are unacceptable for export, I'll respect that decision. Josh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/