Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 18 May 2020 20:46:47 +0200
From:   Jonathan Albrieux <jonathan.albrieux@gmail.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        "open list:IIO SUBSYSTEM AND DRIVERS" <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
        Steve Winslow <swinslow@gmail.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] iio: magnetometer: ak8975: Add gpio reset support
Message-ID: <20200518184647.GB6392@jonathan-N53SV>
References: <20200518133645.19127-1-jonathan.albrieux@gmail.com>
 <20200518133645.19127-4-jonathan.albrieux@gmail.com>
 <CAHp75VdFJUNOtRyCNEGnvoOCZYoPvyhjC15_iC72JD-1sOavwA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20200518160120.GA21361@ict14-OptiPlex-980>
 <20200518164317.GL1634618@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <20200518174335.GA6392@jonathan-N53SV>
 <CAHp75VcJ+LU_T4jRVNDBed50xaALDLNC_8brxszv5FpUGHF7+A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VcJ+LU_T4jRVNDBed50xaALDLNC_8brxszv5FpUGHF7+A@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 08:51:29PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 8:43 PM Jonathan Albrieux
> <jonathan.albrieux@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 07:43:17PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 06:01:20PM +0200, Jonathan Albrieux wrote:
> > > > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 05:55:51PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 4:38 PM Jonathan Albrieux
> > > > > <jonathan.albrieux@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +       gpiod_set_value_cansleep(data->reset_gpiod, 1);
> > > > >
> > > > > (1)
> > > > >
> > > > > ...
> > > > >
> > > > > > +       /*
> > > > > > +        * If reset pin is provided then will be set to high on power on
> > > > > > +        * and to low on power off according to AK09911 datasheet
> > > > > > +        */
> > > > >
> > > > > Wording is confusing, perhaps you have to use 'asserted / deasserted'.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for the suggestion, I'll be working on rewording as soon as
> > > > possible.
> > > >
> > > > > Btw, in (1) it's also "high" (asserted). I barely understand how it's
> > > > > supposed to work in all cases?
> > > > >
> > > > > > +       reset_gpiod = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&client->dev,
> > > > > > +                                             "reset", GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> > > > > > +       if (IS_ERR(reset_gpiod))
> > > > > > +               return PTR_ERR(reset_gpiod);
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I'm sorry but I'm not sure about what you mean by saying all cases.
> > > > Currently  I'm testing this driver on a msm8916 device having AK09911
> > > > magnetometer. At the current stage the driver is failing on probe
> > > > because reset pin is not connected to VID (as datasheet requires in case
> > > > of pin not being used). In case of reset pin not asserted, register's
> > > > reset is triggered resulting in empty registers, leading to probe fail.
> > > > For this reason pin is asserted during power on in order to have
> > > > informations in registers and deasserted before power off triggering
> > > > a reset.
> > > >
> > > > A workaround that gets AK09911 working on device is by setting the
> > > > reset pin always high on device tree. This way registers gets reset by
> > > > a Power On Reset circuit autonomously and reset pin never triggers the
> > > > reset.
> > >
> > > You need to distinguish electrical level from logical (GPIO flag defines
> > > logical). So, I'm talking about active-high vs. active-low case.
> > >
> > > Now I re-read above, and see that here you assert the reset signal. But where
> > > is desertion?
> >
> > Oh I see, I'll try explaining by points the proposed approach:
> > - reset pin is active low
> > - during power on gpio is set to 0 so the reset pin is high, thus no reset
> 
> deasserted
> 
> > - during power off gpio is set to 1 so the reset pin becomes low, thus resetting
> 
> asserted
> 
> > this is a possible solution but maybe there are other ways to achieve that,
> > do you have suggestions on how to get a better approach for solving this issue?
> 
> I see now, that at requesting reset you wanted to chip be in reset
> state (asserted) till driver calls power_on().
> 
> Seems everything you done is correct. Just correct terminology, please.

Will surely do, thank you!
 
> -- 
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko

Best regards,
Jonathan Albrieux