Received: by 2002:a25:868d:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z13csp2994045ybk; Mon, 18 May 2020 13:04:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzN8cLofM+qXFXtXfbLF6x2OFDBNVZCWjTpj1F1vR4ROohrOuq3+B06nnlGWx0DWti25LRX X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c82b:: with SMTP id dd11mr3719127ejb.380.1589832289164; Mon, 18 May 2020 13:04:49 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1589832289; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=AF2xGcir9aPNyMZ2sIZQNqZwZit1ylhzeJ8LUmzEft5ny9fQzJelDhX4Rb4OYSX2uV tkQgnemGAUyVi/YH4YWKRzXxLHk5FZ1E57eztxK2n2bd/RgqjgOHdMTmI75rHJturweV E2OyxjoZaSAHAeaeJjhRlpAOrBbOIjLZ2+k8rrp7xKxN6XI6yNoUW9TIqN6UltAiLRcb 9U6WbeIicaNJjqx0zkzjHtwstmclD3Zai+giObGFPw9j6G7UacpQo/Qi3PMQf+QDlSzj v8WSNz+zbnYFJ/b0cFpHOQSpkQcDZrtp9kw3h4cWE6RrcZFGliEsWK8hbzyqmoXJinKo LW9w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to :from:date; bh=n86/33isQ0ddGqr3MxM9FbL0m0ZSGxj9uLS2kBalgHY=; b=TnrHq+jgwB9PIrKTE/NcbuC9O/Y8AW2jfX+joDpFoyAQHCVN4W9liQnnkq5tQ1cxAX mk82eO68upiOIGYVV9UDxBCNU2PzxxYnUJEHadph7aJr0G60YG/2gaL5lvh1rUR2ty4t mcv44M6yvKbfh0c0fjhSd0u8NzfMahnm5EVyHXmdpd6kOs3tThrxgV6jguZGTF+x2loJ cq55haPf4O7yrZzqnOk0T88k0rzd44QAbJ79JnJjjKi51wqXwrvxdllHSncTZBUER5k8 7UlQtuUOmC4NCxW4YSZAh63yJvufMjOPlXkrWPd0OJSm5bSpi0qsNNLwJPtlTkLzZVsC uSzA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=vmware.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bx1si863688edb.573.2020.05.18.13.04.25; Mon, 18 May 2020 13:04:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=vmware.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727909AbgERTUQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 18 May 2020 15:20:16 -0400 Received: from ex13-edg-ou-001.vmware.com ([208.91.0.189]:19760 "EHLO EX13-EDG-OU-001.vmware.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727066AbgERTUO (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 May 2020 15:20:14 -0400 Received: from sc9-mailhost3.vmware.com (10.113.161.73) by EX13-EDG-OU-001.vmware.com (10.113.208.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1156.6; Mon, 18 May 2020 12:20:13 -0700 Received: from localhost (unknown [10.200.192.41]) by sc9-mailhost3.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D0C9404BC; Mon, 18 May 2020 12:20:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 12:20:13 -0700 From: Matt Helsley To: Josh Poimboeuf CC: , Peter Zijlstra , Julien Thierry , Miroslav Benes , Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] objtool: Enable compilation of objtool for all architectures Message-ID: <20200518192013.GP9040@rlwimi.vmware.com> Mail-Followup-To: Matt Helsley , Josh Poimboeuf , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Julien Thierry , Miroslav Benes , Steven Rostedt References: <9f709ea2ae66cc03b3ff3329baa8f670ccd0e368.1588888003.git.mhelsley@vmware.com> <20200515205610.fmdimt7wbafypuqc@treble> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200515205610.fmdimt7wbafypuqc@treble> Received-SPF: None (EX13-EDG-OU-001.vmware.com: mhelsley@vmware.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 03:56:10PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:35:12AM -0700, Matt Helsley wrote: > > +struct insn_state { > > + struct cfi_reg cfa; > > + struct cfi_reg regs[CFI_NUM_REGS]; > > + int stack_size; > > + unsigned char type; > > + bool bp_scratch; > > + bool drap, end, uaccess, df; > > + bool noinstr; > > + s8 instr; > > + unsigned int uaccess_stack; > > + int drap_reg, drap_offset; > > + struct cfi_reg vals[CFI_NUM_REGS]; > > +}; > > + > > +struct instruction { > > + struct list_head list; > > + struct hlist_node hash; > > + struct section *sec; > > + unsigned long offset; > > + unsigned int len; > > + enum insn_type type; > > + unsigned long immediate; > > + bool alt_group, dead_end, ignore, hint, save, restore, ignore_alts; > > + bool retpoline_safe; > > + s8 instr; > > + u8 visited; > > + struct symbol *call_dest; > > + struct instruction *jump_dest; > > + struct instruction *first_jump_src; > > + struct rela *jump_table; > > + struct list_head alts; > > + struct symbol *func; > > + struct stack_op stack_op; > > + struct insn_state state; > > + struct orc_entry orc; > > +}; > > Why were these moved to arch.h? They're not necessarily arch-specific, > but rather "check"-specific, so I think they still belong in check.h, if > possible. Hmm, good question. I thought it had something to do with the CFI_NUM_REGS definition but even if that's the case I think you're right that it should stay in "check" -- I can verify and if that's the case just just define it to some dummy value (1?) when it's missing. Cheers, -Matt Helsley