Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:46:43 -0800
From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
To: gcoady@gmail.com
Cc: lexington.luthor@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Which kernel is the best for a small linux system?
Message-Id: <20060314174643.6a5a53df.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
In-Reply-To: <ppre129ugea16tmnk085nepi7nj45mkb89@4ax.com>
References: <436c596f0603121640h4f286d53h9f1dd177fd0475a4@mail.gmail.com>
	<dv38rn$430$1@sea.gmane.org>
	<ppre129ugea16tmnk085nepi7nj45mkb89@4ax.com>
Organization: YPO4
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 777
Lines: 21

On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 12:35:50 +1100 Grant Coady wrote:

> On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 08:00:51 +0000, Lexington Luthor <lexington.luthor@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >You might want to look into patch sets like the 2.6-tiny patches, which 
> >greatly reduce the memory footprint of the kernel: 
> >http://www.selenic.com/linux-tiny/
> 
> Seems to have stalled since Oct'05?

maybe not going as strongly as it once was, but parts of it
have been merged into mainline and (parts of) it are also being
used in CELF (www.celinuxforum.org).

---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/